首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Dietary Glycemic Index and Load and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies
【2h】

Dietary Glycemic Index and Load and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies

机译:膳食血糖指数和负荷量与2型糖尿病的风险:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和最新Meta分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Published meta-analyses indicate significant but inconsistent incident type-2 diabetes (T2D)-dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) risk ratios or risk relations (RR). It is now over a decade ago that a published meta-analysis used a predefined standard to identify valid studies. Considering valid studies only, and using random effects dose–response meta-analysis (DRM) while withdrawing spurious results (p < 0.05), we ascertained whether these relations would support nutrition guidance, specifically for an RR > 1.20 with a lower 95% confidence limit >1.10 across typical intakes (approximately 10th to 90th percentiles of population intakes). The combined T2D–GI RR was 1.27 (1.15–1.40) (p < 0.001, n = 10 studies) per 10 units GI, while that for the T2D–GL RR was 1.26 (1.15–1.37) (p < 0.001, n = 15) per 80 g/d GL in a 2000 kcal (8400 kJ) diet. The corresponding global DRM using restricted cubic splines were 1.87 (1.56–2.25) (p < 0.001, n = 10) and 1.89 (1.66–2.16) (p < 0.001, n = 15) from 47.6 to 76.1 units GI and 73 to 257 g/d GL in a 2000 kcal diet, respectively. In conclusion, among adults initially in good health, diets higher in GI or GL were robustly associated with incident T2D. Together with mechanistic and other data, this supports that consideration should be given to these dietary risk factors in nutrition advice. Concerning the public health relevance at the global level, our evidence indicates that GI and GL are substantial food markers predicting the development of T2D worldwide, for persons of European ancestry and of East Asian ancestry.
机译:已发表的荟萃分析表明,发生严重但不一致的2型糖尿病(T2D)-饮食血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)风险比或风险关系(RR)。如今,十多年前,已发表的荟萃分析使用预定义的标准来识别有效的研究。仅考虑有效研究,并使用随机效应剂量反应荟萃分析(DRM)并撤回虚假结果(p <0.05),我们确定了这些关系是否会支持营养指导,特别是对于RR> 1.20(95%置信度较低)通常摄入量的上限> 1.10(大约人口摄入量的10%至90%)。每10个GI的T2D–GI RR组合为1.27(1.15–1.40)(p <0.001,n = 10个研究),而T2D–GL RR的组合为1.26(1.15-1.37)(p <0.001,n = 15)2000 kcal(8400 kJ)日粮中每80 g / d GL。使用受限三次样条的相应全局DRM从47.6到76.1单位GI和73到257为1.87(1.56-2.25)(p <0.001,n = 10)和1.89(1.66-2.16)(p <0.001,n = 15) 2000 kcal日粮中的g / d GL。总之,在最初健康状况良好的成年人中,GI或GL较高的饮食与T2D事件密切相关。结合机理和其他数据,这支持在营养建议中应考虑这些饮食风险因素。关于全球范围内的公共卫生相关性,我们的证据表明,对于欧洲血统和东亚血统的人来说,地理标志和GL是预测全世界T2D发展的重要食品标志。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号