首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Comparing Different Residential Neighborhood Definitions and the Association Between Density of Restaurants and Home Cooking Among Dutch Adults
【2h】

Comparing Different Residential Neighborhood Definitions and the Association Between Density of Restaurants and Home Cooking Among Dutch Adults

机译:比较不同的居民区定义以及荷兰成年人中餐馆密度和家庭烹饪之间的关联

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The definition of neighborhoods as areas of exposure to the food environment is a challenge in food environment research. We aimed to test the association of density of restaurants with home cooking using four different definitions of residential neighborhoods. We also tested effect modification by age, length of residency, education, and income. This innovative cross-sectional study was conducted in the Netherlands (N = 1245 adults). We calculated geographic information system-based measures of restaurant density using residential administrative neighborhood boundaries, 800 m and 1600 m buffers around the home and respondents’ self-defined boundaries (drawn by the respondents on a map of their residential area). We used adjusted Poisson regression to test associations of restaurant density (tertiles) and the outcome ”weekly consumption of home-cooked meals” (six to seven as compared to five days per week (day/week) or fewer). Most respondents reported eating home-cooked meals for at least 6 day/week (74.2%). Regardless of the neighborhood definition used, no association between food environment and home cooking was observed. No effect modification was found. Although exposure in terms of density of restaurants was different according to the four different neighborhood definitions, we found no evidence that the area under study influences the association between density of restaurants and home cooking among Dutch adults.
机译:在食品环境研究中,将邻里定义为暴露于食品环境的区域是一个挑战。我们旨在使用四种不同的居民区定义来测试餐馆密度与家庭烹饪的关联。我们还测试了按年龄,居住时间,学历和收入划分的效果调整。这项创新的横断面研究是在荷兰进行的(N = 1245名成人)。我们使用居住行政区域边界,房屋周围800 m和1600 m缓冲区以及受访者的自定义边界(由受访者在其居住区域的地图上绘制)计算了基于地理信息系统的餐厅密度度量。我们使用调整后的Poisson回归来测试餐厅密度(三分位数)与“每周一次自制餐的消费量”(六到七周,而不是每周五天(天/周)或更少)之间的关联。大多数受访者报告每周至少吃6天(74.2%)的家庭做饭。无论使用哪种邻里定义,都没有观察到食物环境和家庭烹饪之间的关联。找不到效果修改。尽管根据四种不同的邻里定义,餐馆密度的暴露程度有所不同,但我们没有发现证据表明所研究的区域会影响荷兰成年人中餐馆密度与家庭烹饪之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号