首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals
【2h】

Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals

机译:在营养专业人员中审查数字化食物图像以进行膳食评估的可行性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Validity of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods relies on the accuracy of portion size estimation based on food images. However, little is known on the ability of nutrition professionals in assessing dietary intake based on digital food images. This study aims to examine the ability of nutrition professionals in reviewing food images with regard to food item identification and portion size estimation. Thirty-eight nutritionists, dietitians, and nutrition researchers participated in this study. Through an online questionnaire, participants’ accuracy in identifying food items and estimating portion sizes of two sets of digital food images presenting a meal on a plate (Image PL) and in a bowl (Image BW) were tested. Participants reported higher accuracy in interpreting Image BW compared to Image PL, both in terms of accuracy in food identification (75.3 ± 17.6 vs. 68.9 ± 17.1%) and percentage difference in portion size estimation (44.3 ± 16.6 vs. 47.6 ± 21.2%). Weight of raw vegetables was significantly underestimated (−45.1 ± 22.8% vs. −21.2 ± 37.4%), while drink was significantly overestimated (40.1 ± 45.8% vs. 26.1 ± 32.2) in both images. Less than one-third of the participants estimated portion size within 10% of actual weight for Image PL (23.7%) and Image BW (32.3%). Accuracy of nutrition professionals in reviewing food images could be further improved with training on better perception of portion sizes from images.
机译:图像辅助和基于图像的饮食评估方法的有效性取决于基于食物图像的份量估计的准确性。但是,对于营养专业人员基于数字食物图像评估饮食摄入量的能力知之甚少。这项研究旨在检验营养专业人员在审查食品图像方面的能力,以识别食品项目和估计份量。 38位营养学家,营养师和营养研究人员参加了这项研究。通过在线问卷,测试了参与者识别食物的准确性以及估计在盘子(图像PL)和碗(图像BW)中呈现饭食的两组数字食物图像的分量大小的准确性。参与者表示,与图像PL相比,图像BW的解释准确性更高,无论是食品识别的准确性(75.3±17.6 vs. 68.9±17.1%),还是份量估计的百分比差异(44.3±16.6 vs. 47.6±21.2%) 。在这两个图像中,未加工蔬菜的重量都被大大低估了(-45.1±22.8%vs.-21.2±37.4%),而饮料则被大大高估了(40.1±45.8%vs. 26.1±32.2)。不到三分之一的参与者估计图像PL(23.7%)和图像BW(32.3%)的份量在实际重量的10%以内。营养专业人员在审查食物图像时的准确性可以通过培训更好地理解图像中的份量来提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号