首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >Clinical utility of implantable neurostimulation devices as adjunctive treatment of uncontrolled seizures
【2h】

Clinical utility of implantable neurostimulation devices as adjunctive treatment of uncontrolled seizures

机译:植入式神经刺激仪在辅助治疗无法控制的癫痫发作中的临床应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

About one third of patients with epilepsy are refractory to medical treatment. For these patients, alternative treatment options include implantable neurostimulation devices such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation systems (RNS). We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the available evidence on the clinical efficacy of these devices in patients with refractory epilepsy across their lifespan. VNS has the largest evidence base, and numerous randomized controlled trials and open-label studies support its use in the treatment of refractory epilepsy. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1997 for treatment of partial seizures, but has also shown significant benefit in the treatment of generalized seizures. Results in adult populations have been more encouraging than in pediatric populations, where more studies are required. VNS is considered a safe and well-tolerated treatment, and serious side effects are rare. DBS is a well-established treatment for several movement disorders, and has a small evidence base for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus has shown the most encouraging results, where significant decreases in seizure frequency were reported. Other potential targets include the centromedian thalamic nucleus, hippocampus, cerebellum, and basal ganglia structures. Preliminary results on RNS, new-generation implantable neurostimulation devices which stimulate brain structures only when epileptic activity is detected, are encouraging. Overall, implantable neurostimulation devices appear to be a safe and beneficial treatment option for patients in whom medical treatment has failed to adequately control their epilepsy. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to provide a sufficient evidence base for the inclusion of DBS and RNS in clinical guidelines.
机译:约有三分之一的癫痫患者难以接受药物治疗。对于这些患者,替代治疗选择包括植入式神经刺激设备,例如迷走神经刺激(VNS),深部脑刺激(DBS)和响应性神经刺激系统(RNS)。我们进行了系统的文献综述,以评估这些设备在难治性癫痫患者一生中的临床疗效。 VNS具有最大的证据基础,许多随机对照试验和开放标签研究支持其在难治性癫痫治疗中的应用。它于1997年被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于治疗部分性癫痫,但在治疗全身性癫痫中也显示出显着的益处。与需要更多研究的儿童人群相比,成人人群的结果令人鼓舞。 VNS被认为是安全且耐受良好的治疗方法,很少有严重的副作用。 DBS是一种针对多种运动障碍的行之有效的治疗方法,并且对于难治性癫痫的治疗具有很小的证据基础。丘脑前核的刺激显示出最令人鼓舞的结果,据报道癫痫发作频率显着降低。其他潜在的靶标包括着丝粒的丘脑核,海马,小脑和基底神经节结构。令人鼓舞的是,RNS是新一代可植入神经刺激设备,仅在检测到癫痫活动时才刺激大脑结构,初步结果令人鼓舞。总体而言,对于药物治疗未能充分控制其癫痫病的患者,植入式神经刺激装置似乎是一种安全而有益的治疗选择。需要进一步的大规模随机对照试验,以为将DBS和RNS纳入临床指南提供足够的证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号