首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine >Montelukast versus inhaled corticosteroids in the management of pediatric mild persistent asthma
【2h】

Montelukast versus inhaled corticosteroids in the management of pediatric mild persistent asthma

机译:孟鲁司特与吸入性糖皮质激素治疗小儿轻度持续性哮喘

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

International guidelines recommend the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) as the preferred therapy, with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) as an alternative, for the management of persistent asthma in children. Montelukast (MLK) is the first LTRA approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the use in young asthmatic children.Therefore, we performed an analysis of studies that compared the efficacy of MLK versus ICSs. We considered eligible for the inclusion randomized, controlled trials on pediatric populations with Jadad score > 3, with at least 4 weeks of treatment with MLK compared with ICS.Although it is important to recognize that ICSs use is currently the recommended first-line treatment for asthmatic children, MLK can have consistent benefits in controlling asthmatic symptoms and may be an alternative in children unable to use ICSs or suffering from poor growth. On the contrary, low pulmonary function and/or high allergic inflammatory markers require the corticosteroid use.
机译:国际指南建议使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICSs)作为首选疗法,以白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRAs)作为替代疗法,以治疗儿童持续性哮喘。孟鲁司特(MLK)是美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的首个用于哮喘儿童的LTRA。因此,我们对研究进行了分析,比较了MLK和ICSs的疗效。我们认为有资格纳入Jadad评分> 3的小儿人群的随机,对照试验,与ICS相比,MLK治疗至少4星期,尽管重要的是要认识到ICSs是目前推荐的一线治疗对于哮喘儿童,MLK在控制哮喘症状方面具有一致的益处,对于无法使用ICS或生长不良的儿童,MLK可能是一种替代选择。相反,低肺功能和/或高过敏性炎症标志物需要使用皮质类固醇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号