首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research >The Profile of Academic Offenders: Features of Students Who Admit to Academic Dishonesty
【2h】

The Profile of Academic Offenders: Features of Students Who Admit to Academic Dishonesty

机译:学术犯的概况:承认学术不诚实的学生的特征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dishonesty in academic settings is a reckless behavior that is unique to students and is associated with cheat ing and plagiarism of academic tasks. Incidents involving dishonesty in higher education have increased considerably in the past decade, with regard to the extent of these practices, the types of dishonesty employed, and their prevalence. The current study examines the profile of “academic offenders”. Which types are more prone to commit academic offenses? To what degree are they “normative” and do they represent the average student with regard to personal traits, personal perceptions, features of their academic studies, risk behaviors, and health risks. The study is based on a structured anonymous questionnaire. The sample consisted of 1,432 students, of whom 899 were female (63%) and 533 male (37%). The research findings indicate a common tendency among more than one quarter of the sample reported cheating on homework and 12.5% reported cheating on tests. Strong associations were found between academic dishonesty and various personal perceptions, the academic study experience, and involvement in other risky and deviant behaviors. Significant predictors of academic dishonesty were found, i.e., self-image, ethics, grades, time devoted to homework, and deviant and daring behaviors.The research findings might help indicate policies for optimally dealing with dishonesty, maybe even before the offense is committed, by means of cooperation between academic forces.
机译:学术环境中的不诚实行为是一种鲁re的行为,这种行为是学生所特有的,并且与学术任务的作弊和窃有关。在过去十年中,就这些做法的程度,所采用的不诚实类型及其普遍性而言,涉及高等教育中不诚实行为的事件已大大增加。当前的研究审查了“学术罪犯”的概况。哪些类型更容易犯学术罪行?他们在何种程度上具有“规范性”,在个人特征,个人观念,学术研究的特征,风险行为和健康风险方面,它们代表普通学生。该研究基于结构化的匿名调查表。样本包括1,432名学生,其中899名女性(63%)和533名男性(37%)。研究发现表明,在四分之一以上报告作弊的样本和12.5%考试作弊的样本中,有一种普遍的趋势。在学术不诚实和各种个人观念,学术学习经历以及参与其他危险和越轨行为之间发现了强烈的关联。发现了学术不诚实的重要预测因素,例如自我形象,道德,等级,投入功课的时间以及过分大胆的行为。研究结果可能有助于指出最佳处理不诚实的政策,甚至在犯罪发生之前,通过学术力量之间的合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号