首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ultrasound: Journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society >Sonographic imaging of extra-testicular focal lesions: comparison of grey-scale colour Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound
【2h】

Sonographic imaging of extra-testicular focal lesions: comparison of grey-scale colour Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

机译:睾丸外局灶性病变的超声成像:灰度彩色多普勒超声和对比增强超声的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Extra-testicular lesions are usually benign but present with nonspecific grey-scale sonography findings. This study assesses conventional sonographic characteristics in the differentiation of extra-testicular tumoural from inflammatory lesions and whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound has a role. A retrospective database analysis was performed. All patients were examined by experienced sonographers employing standard techniques combining grey-scale, colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Features recorded were: clinical symptoms, size, location, echogenicity, colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement. Vascularity on colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound was graded and compared. The lesions were classified as tumoural or inflammatory. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the sonographic patterns and kappa coefficient to measure the agreement between colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A total of 30 lesions were reviewed (median diameter 12 mm, range 5–80 mm, median age 52 years, range 18–86 years), including 13/30 tumoural and 17/30 inflammatory lesions. Lesions were hypoechoic (n = 12), isoechoic (n = 6), hyperechoic (n = 2) or mixed (n = 10). Grey-scale characteristics of tumoural vs. inflammatory lesions differed significantly (P = 0.026). On colour Doppler sonography, lesions had no vessels (n = 16), 2–3 vessels (n = 10) and ≥4 vessels (n = 4). On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, lesions showed no vascularity (n = 17), perfusion similar to testis (n = 7) and higher (n = 6). All abscesses identified (n = 9) showed no vascularity on both colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. There was good agreement between these techniques in evaluating vascularity (κ = 0.719) and no significant difference between colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of tumoural vs. inflammatory lesions (P > 0.05). The grey-scale appearances of extra-testicular lesions are essential for characterisation. Colour Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings are not useful in that respect. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is excellent in establishing absence of vascularity.
机译:睾丸外病变通常是良性的,但存在非特异性的灰度超声检查结果。这项研究评估了常规超声检查在区分睾丸外肿瘤与炎性病变以及超声造影是否起作用方面的超声特征。进行回顾性数据库分析。所有患者均由经验丰富的超声检查师进行检查,他们采用标准技术结合了灰度,彩色多普勒超声检查和对比增强超声检查。记录的特征包括:临床症状,大小,位置,回声,彩色多普勒超声检查和超声造影增强。对彩色多普勒超声和对比增强超声上的血管进行分级和比较。病变分为肿瘤性或炎症性。卡方检验用于分析超声图谱和kappa系数,以测量彩色多普勒超声图和对比增强超声之间的一致性。共检查了30个病变(中位直径12 mm,范围5-80 mm,中位年龄52岁,范围18-86岁),包括13/30肿瘤和17/30炎性病变。病变为低回声(n = 12),等回声(n = 6),高回声(n = 2)或混合(n = 10)。肿瘤性病变与炎症性病变的灰度特征差异显着(P = 0.026)。在彩色多普勒超声检查中,病变无血管(n = 16),2-3血管(n = 10)和≥4血管(n = 4)。在对比增强超声检查中,病变无血管(n = 17),灌注与睾丸相似(n = 7)且更高(n = 6)。在彩色多普勒超声检查和对比增强超声检查中,所有已发现的脓肿(n = 9)均未显示血管。这些技术在评估血管性方面有很好的一致性(κ= 0.719),彩色多普勒超声检查与肿瘤和炎症性病变的对比超声检查之间无显着差异(P> 0.05)。睾丸外病变的灰度外观对于表征至关重要。彩色多普勒超声检查和对比增强的超声检查结果在这方面没有用。造影增强超声可以很好地确定无血管形成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号