首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Leukemia Supplements >Fungal infections: diagnostic problems and choice of therapy
【2h】

Fungal infections: diagnostic problems and choice of therapy

机译:真菌感染:诊断问题和治疗选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fungi are typically opportunistic pathogens. Formerly, limitations in diagnostic techniques explain why invasive fungal infections are usually detected in a late stage of their development. Therefore, traditional guidelines dictate antifungal treatment for all patients with persisting fever. This is not longer justifiable in view of the potential adverse events and the economical burden associated with the use of the new antifungal drugs in an era with improved diagnostic tools. Amphotericin B has been the drug of choice for invasive fungal infections for more than 30 years. Owing to nephrotoxicity, its use in neutropenic patients has been largely abandoned in favor of a lipid formulation of amphotericin B, of which only liposomal amphotericin B has been scientifically tested in the first-line treatment of aspergillosis. Azoles constitute an acceptable alternative to intravenous amphotericin B for many invasive fungal infections.
机译:真菌通常是机会病原体。以前,诊断技术的局限性解释了为什么通常在其发展的后期发现侵入性真菌感染。因此,传统指南要求对所有持续发烧的患者进行抗真菌治疗。考虑到在具有改进的诊断工具的时代中与使用新的抗真菌药物相关的潜在不良事件和经济负担,这不再是合理的。 30多年来,两性霉素B一直是侵袭性真菌感染的首选药物。由于肾毒性,它在中性粒细胞减少症患者中的使用已被广泛放弃,而改为使用两性霉素B的脂质制剂,其中只有脂质体两性霉素B在曲霉病的一线治疗中得到了科学测试。对于许多侵入性真菌感染,唑类化合物是静脉两性霉素B的可接受替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号