首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Computational Biology >Behavioral Modeling of Human Choices Reveals Dissociable Effects of Physical Effort and Temporal Delay on Reward Devaluation
【2h】

Behavioral Modeling of Human Choices Reveals Dissociable Effects of Physical Effort and Temporal Delay on Reward Devaluation

机译:人类选择的行为建模揭示了体力劳动和时间延迟对奖励贬值的不同影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There has been considerable interest from the fields of biology, economics, psychology, and ecology about how decision costs decrease the value of rewarding outcomes. For example, formal descriptions of how reward value changes with increasing temporal delays allow for quantifying individual decision preferences, as in animal species populating different habitats, or normal and clinical human populations. Strikingly, it remains largely unclear how humans evaluate rewards when these are tied to energetic costs, despite the surge of interest in the neural basis of effort-guided decision-making and the prevalence of disorders showing a diminished willingness to exert effort (e.g., depression). One common assumption is that effort discounts reward in a similar way to delay. Here we challenge this assumption by formally comparing competing hypotheses about effort and delay discounting. We used a design specifically optimized to compare discounting behavior for both effort and delay over a wide range of decision costs (Experiment 1). We then additionally characterized the profile of effort discounting free of model assumptions (Experiment 2). Contrary to previous reports, in both experiments effort costs devalued reward in a manner opposite to delay, with small devaluations for lower efforts, and progressively larger devaluations for higher effort-levels (concave shape). Bayesian model comparison confirmed that delay-choices were best predicted by a hyperbolic model, with the largest reward devaluations occurring at shorter delays. In contrast, an altogether different relationship was observed for effort-choices, which were best described by a model of inverse sigmoidal shape that is initially concave. Our results provide a novel characterization of human effort discounting behavior and its first dissociation from delay discounting. This enables accurate modelling of cost-benefit decisions, a prerequisite for the investigation of the neural underpinnings of effort-guided choice and for understanding the deficits in clinical disorders characterized by behavioral inactivity.
机译:生物学,经济学,心理学和生态学领域对决策成本如何降低奖励性成果的价值引起了极大的兴趣。例如,关于奖励价值如何随时间延迟增加而变化的正式描述,可以量化个体的决策偏好,例如在居住于不同栖息地或正常和临床人群的动物物种中。令人惊讶的是,尽管对以努力为导向的决策的神经基础的兴趣激增,并且普遍存在表现出付出努力的意愿减弱的疾病(例如抑郁症),但当人们将奖励与精力充沛的代价联系在一起时,人们如何评估这些奖励仍然非常不清楚。 )。一个普遍的假设是,工作量折扣以类似的方式奖励延迟。在这里,我们通过正式比较有关努力和延迟贴现的竞争假设来挑战这一假设。我们使用了一种经过特别优化的设计,以比较各种决策成本下的努力和延误的贴现行为(实验1)。然后,我们还额外地描述了没有模型假设的工作量折扣的特征(实验2)。与以前的报告相反,在两个实验中,工作成本都以与延期相反的方式使报酬贬值,其中较小的贬值表示较低的努力,而逐渐的较大的贬值则表示较高的工作水平(凹形)。贝叶斯模型比较证实,双曲线模型可以最好地预测延迟选择,最大的奖励贬值发生在较短的延迟上。相反,对于努力选择,观察到完全不同的关系,最好用最初是凹形的反S形模型来描述。我们的结果提供了人力折扣行为的新特征,以及它与延迟折扣的首次分离。这使得能够对成本效益决策进行精确建模,这是研究以工作为导向的选择的神经基础以及了解以行为不活跃为特征的临床疾病缺陷的前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号