首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Contrasting Patterns of Plants Bees Hoverflies and Spiders in Different Habitats in a Central European Agricultural Landscape
【2h】

Contrasting Patterns of Plants Bees Hoverflies and Spiders in Different Habitats in a Central European Agricultural Landscape

机译:中欧农业景观中不同栖息地中植物、蜜蜂、食蚜蝇和蜘蛛的对比图案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Semi‐natural grasslands and their biodiversity decline rapidly, although they are key elements of agricultural landscapes. Therefore, there is a need for the re‐establishment of semi‐natural grasslands in intensively managed farmlands (e.g., via sowing wildflower seeds). Our knowledge, however, is limited on how different arthropod groups may respond to such newly established wildflower fields. This knowledge gap is especially relevant for the Pannonian biogeographical region, and more generally for Central Europe, where there is little to no evidence so far. We aimed to compare three different habitats (i.e., sown wildflower fields (WFF), semi‐natural road verges and adjacent crop fields) in terms of their species and individual numbers and assemblage compositions to reveal differences between primary producers (plants), pollinators (bees and hoverflies) and predators (spiders). We selected eight landscapes in Central Hungary within conventionally managed crop areas. We analysed species and individual numbers by generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) and the assemblage composition with non‐metric multidimensional scaling for each taxon in the three habitats. Crop, road verge and WFF habitats had distinct assemblages for each studied group, indicating clear separation among habitats. There are, however, contrasting patterns in the diversity measures of the studied groups. Crop fields are the poorest in both species and individual numbers, road verges harboured the highest abundance of spiders, while WFF had the most bees and plants. No clear pattern for hoverflies emerged. Our results suggest that the studied habitats do not harbour all groups in equal share. We propose that the design of future restorations in Central European farmlands should target a diversity of habitat types needed to support a wide range of functional groups.
机译:半自然草原及其生物多样性迅速下降,尽管它们是农业景观的关键要素。因此,有必要在集约化管理的农田中重建半自然草原(例如,通过播种野花种子)。然而,我们对不同的节肢动物群体如何应对这些新建立的野花田的了解是有限的。这种知识差距与潘诺尼亚生物地理区域尤其相关,更普遍地说,与中欧有关,到目前为止,那里几乎没有证据。我们旨在比较三种不同的栖息地(即播种野花田 (WFF)、半自然道路边缘和相邻农田)的物种和个体数量以及组合组成,以揭示初级生产者(植物)、传粉者(蜜蜂和食蚜蝇)和捕食者(蜘蛛)之间的差异。我们在匈牙利中部的常规管理作物区内选择了 8 个景观。我们通过广义线性混合模型 (GLMM) 分析了物种和个体数量,并分析了三个栖息地中每个分类单元的非度量多维尺度的组合组成。作物、道路边缘和 WFF 生境对于每个研究组都有不同的组合,表明生境之间有明显的分离。然而,在研究群体的多样性测量中存在相反的模式。农田的物种和个体数量都是最贫乏的,路边的蜘蛛数量最多,而 WFF 的蜜蜂和植物最多。没有出现明显的食蚜蝇模式。我们的结果表明,所研究的栖息地并非所有群体都处于相等的份额。我们建议,中欧农田未来恢复的设计应针对支持广泛功能组所需的多种栖息地类型。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号