首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Biology >Teaching genetics prior to teaching evolution improves evolution understanding but not acceptance
【2h】

Teaching genetics prior to teaching evolution improves evolution understanding but not acceptance

机译:在讲授进化论之前先教遗传学可增进对进化论的理解但不能提高接受度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

What is the best way to teach evolution? As microevolution may be configured as a branch of genetics, it being a short conceptual leap from understanding the concepts of mutation and alleles (i.e., genetics) to allele frequency change (i.e., evolution), we hypothesised that learning genetics prior to evolution might improve student understanding of evolution. In the UK, genetics and evolution are typically taught to 14- to 16-y-old secondary school students as separate topics with few links, in no particular order and sometimes with a large time span between. Here, then, we report the results of a large trial into teaching order of evolution and genetics. We modified extant questionnaires to ascertain students’ understanding of evolution and genetics along with acceptance of evolution. Students were assessed prior to teaching, immediately post teaching and again after several months. Teachers were not instructed what to teach, just to teach in a given order. Regardless of order, teaching increased understanding and acceptance, with robust signs of longer-term retention. Importantly, teaching genetics before teaching evolution has a significant (p < 0.001) impact on improving evolution understanding by 7% in questionnaire scores beyond the increase seen for those taught in the inverse order. For lower ability students, an improvement in evolution understanding was seen only if genetics was taught first. Teaching genetics first additionally had positive effects on genetics understanding, by increasing knowledge. These results suggest a simple, minimally disruptive, zero-cost intervention to improve evolution understanding: teach genetics first. This same alteration does not, however, result in a significantly increased acceptance of evolution, which reflects a weak correlation between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Qualitative focus group data highlights the role of authority figures in determination of acceptance.
机译:教授进化论的最好方法是什么?由于微进化可能被配置为遗传学的一个分支,这是从理解突变和等位基因(即遗传学)到等位基因频率变化(即进化)的短暂概念飞跃,我们假设在进化前学习遗传学可能会有所改善学生对进化的理解。在英国,通常将遗传学和进化学作为单独的主题教给14至16岁的中学生,这些主题几乎没有联系,没有特别的顺序,有时之间的时间跨度很大。然后,在这里,我们报告了有关进化和遗传学教学顺序的大型试验结果。我们修改了现有的问卷,以确认学生对进化和遗传学的理解以及对进化的接受。在教学前,教学后立即和几个月后再次对学生进行评估。没有指示老师教什么,只是按照给定的顺序教。无论顺序如何,教学都可以增进理解和接受,并具有长期保留的明显迹象。重要的是,在讲授进化论之前先教遗传学,对问卷调查得分的改进对进化理解的影响有显着(p <0.001)的影响,超出以相反顺序讲授的受访者所看到的增长。对于能力较弱的学生,只有首先教授遗传学,才能对进化的理解有所改善。首先,通过增加知识,遗传学教学会对遗传学理解产生积极影响。这些结果表明了一种简单的,破坏性最小的零成本干预措施,可以改善对进化的理解:首先要教遗传学。但是,这种相同的更改不会导致对进化的接受度显着提高,这反映了知识与对进化的接受之间的弱关联。定性焦点小组的数据突出显示了权威人物在确定接受程度方面的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号