首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Brain Mapping >Influence of Betrayal on Emotional Modulation of Executive Control: Evidence From ERPs
【2h】

Influence of Betrayal on Emotional Modulation of Executive Control: Evidence From ERPs

机译:背叛对执行控制情绪调节的影响:来自 ERP 的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous studies have found that betrayal increases negative attentional bias and hinders executive control. However, it remains unclear how betrayal influences emotional modulation of executive control. What's more, according to the dual mechanisms of control model, executive control can be divided into reactive and proactive control. It also requires clarification whether both aspects of executive control are affected equally by betrayal in emotional contexts. Thus, the present study aims to provide insight into how betrayal influences the emotional modulation of executive control. Betrayal was induced using a repeated trust game in two experiments. Eighty‐two participants (40 for Experiment 1 and 42 for Experiment 2) completed emotional executive control tasks while event‐related potentials were recorded. In Experiment 1, an emotional Go/No‐go task was used to explore the impact of betrayal on the emotional modulation of executive control. The results indicated that betrayal resulted in inefficient top‐down attention processing towards negative stimuli and impaired executive control over these stimuli. This was evidenced by higher N2a and N2b amplitudes in the angry Go condition, and smaller angry No‐go P3 amplitudes in individuals who experienced betrayal compared to the control group. In Experiment 2, a modified emotional Stroop task was employed to measure proactive and reactive control in emotional contexts. The results indicated that betrayal impaired only reactive control towards negative stimuli and did not affect proactive control. This was evidenced by the betrayed group exhibiting smaller SP amplitudes under the happy incongruent condition in the most congruent context, with no significant difference observed in the most incongruent context. In summary, betrayal decreases the efficiency of top‐down attentional processing directed towards negative stimuli and hampers executive control over negative stimuli. Moreover, this impairment appears to be confined to reactive control strategy.
机译:以前的研究发现,背叛会增加负面的注意力偏差并阻碍执行控制。然而,目前尚不清楚背叛如何影响对执行控制的情绪调节。更重要的是,根据控制模型的双重机制,执行控制可以分为被动控制和主动控制。它还需要澄清,在情感背景下,行政控制的两个方面是否同样受到背叛的影响。因此,本研究旨在深入了解背叛如何影响执行控制的情绪调节。在两个实验中使用重复的信任游戏诱导背叛。82 名参与者 (实验 1 40 名,实验 2 42 名) 完成了情绪执行控制任务,同时记录了与事件相关的电位。在实验 1 中,情绪 Go/No-go 任务用于探索背叛对执行控制的情绪调节的影响。结果表明,背叛导致对负面刺激的自上而下的注意力处理效率低下,并损害了对这些刺激的执行控制。与对照组相比,愤怒 Go 条件下较高的 N2a 和 N2b 振幅以及经历背叛的个体的愤怒 No-go P3 振幅较小证明了这一点。在实验 2 中,采用了修改后的情绪 Stroop 任务来测量情绪情境中的主动和反应控制。结果表明,背叛仅损害了对负面刺激的反应性控制,而不会影响主动控制。被背叛的组在最一致的上下文中在 happy 不一致条件下表现出较小的 SP 振幅,在最不一致的上下文中没有观察到显着差异,这证明了这一点。总之,背叛降低了针对负面刺激的自上而下的注意力处理的效率,并阻碍了对负面刺激的执行控制。此外,这种损害似乎仅限于反应性控制策略。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号