首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Bee Habitat but Not Bee Community Structure Varies Across Grassland Management in Four National Parks in the Mid‐Atlantic USA
【2h】

Bee Habitat but Not Bee Community Structure Varies Across Grassland Management in Four National Parks in the Mid‐Atlantic USA

机译:蜜蜂栖息地但蜜蜂群落结构在美国大西洋中部的四个国家公园的草原管理中有所不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

National Park Service units in the United States play a large role in providing habitat for native pollinators. In parks that are established to preserve cultural landscapes, park managers recognize an opportunity to improve pollinator habitat while maintaining historically accurate conditions. In this study, we document floral resources and native bees within managed park grasslands, with the goal of providing information to managers to help them maximize pollinator habitat while meeting other management objectives. The study was performed on 37 grassland properties in the mid‐Atlantic region of the eastern United States, distributed across four parks; each property was managed with one of three management types: cool‐season hayed, cool‐season pasture, or warm‐season meadows managed with multiple approaches. We surveyed bees and open flowers on 50‐m transects twice each year in 2021 and 2022. Repeated‐measures ANOVA models revealed that mean bee abundance, richness, evenness, and diversity did not vary among sites or management types. This finding was further supported by a principal coordinates analysis that showed that bee community composition was similar across management types. Nonetheless, we found evidence to indicate that the three management types did not produce equivalent habitat for bees. Species accumulation curves showed that the effective number of flower species was consistently lower in cool‐season pastures, relative to the other two management types. Furthermore, we detected positive correlations between bee and flower diversity metrics in one of the 2 years, indicating that floral metrics are associated with bee communities, at least under certain conditions. Collectively, our study suggests that cool‐season fields that are hayed and warm‐season meadows have higher floral diversity than cool‐season pastures within national park units of the mid‐Atlantic region, and this higher diversity of forbs has the potential to benefit native bee diversity.
机译:美国国家公园管理局 (National Park Service) 的单位在为本地传粉媒介提供栖息地方面发挥着重要作用。在为保护文化景观而建立的公园中,公园管理者认识到有机会改善传粉媒介栖息地,同时保持历史准确的条件。在这项研究中,我们记录了受管理的公园草原内的花卉资源和本地蜜蜂,目的是为管理人员提供信息,帮助他们在满足其他管理目标的同时最大限度地利用传粉媒介栖息地。该研究对美国东部大西洋中部地区的 37 处草原进行了研究,分布在四个公园;每个物业都通过以下三种管理类型之一进行管理:冷季干草、冷季牧场或暖季草地,采用多种方法管理。我们在 2021 年和 2022 年每年两次调查 50 m 样带上的蜜蜂和开放的花朵。重复测量方差分析模型显示,平均蜜蜂的丰度、丰富度、均匀度和多样性在地点或管理类型之间没有变化。主坐标分析进一步支持了这一发现,该分析表明蜜蜂群落的组成在不同的管理类型中是相似的。尽管如此,我们发现的证据表明,这三种管理类型并没有为蜜蜂产生等效的栖息地。物种积累曲线显示,相对于其他两种管理类型,冷季牧场的花种有效数量始终较低。此外,我们在 2 年中的一年中检测到蜜蜂和花卉多样性指标之间存在正相关,这表明花卉指标与蜜蜂群落相关,至少在某些条件下是这样。总的来说,我们的研究表明,干草和暖季草甸的冷季田地比大西洋中部地区国家公园内的冷季牧场具有更高的花卉多样性,这种杂草的较高多样性有可能有利于本地蜜蜂的多样性。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号