首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinics >A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History Clinical Trial Results and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers
【2h】

A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History Clinical Trial Results and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers

机译:血液替代品的评论:审查基于血红蛋白的氧气载体的历史临床试验结果和伦理学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The complications associated with acquiring and storing whole blood for transfusions have launched substantial efforts to develop a blood substitute. The history of these efforts involves a complicated mixture of science, ethics, and business. This review focuses on clinical trials of the three hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOC) that have progressed to Phase II or III clinical trials: He-mAssist (Baxter; Deerfield, IL, US), PolyHeme (Northfield; Evanston, IL, US), and Hemopure (Biopure; Cambridge, MA, US). Published animal studies and clinical trials carried out in a perioperative setting have demonstrated that these products successfully transport and deliver oxygen, but all may induce hypertension and lead to unexpectedly low cardiac outputs. Overall, these studies suggest that HBOCs resulted in only modest blood saving during and after surgery, no improvement in mortality and an increased incidence of adverse reactions. To date, the results from these perioperative studies have not led to regulatory approval. All three companies instead chose to focus their efforts on large trials of trauma patients in the pre-hospital setting.Baxter abandoned the development of HemAssist after a trial in the U.S. was prematurely halted when the first 100 patients showed significantly increased mortality rates as compared to patients treated with blood products. Northfield’s PolyHeme trial demonstrated a non-significant trend towards increased mortality and a very modest reduction in the subsequent need for blood. The testing of Biopure’s Hemopure for trauma patients has been halted for several years because of FDA concerns over trial design and study justification. Ethical concerns have also been raised regarding the design and implementation of all HBOC clinical trials.Thus, the available evidence suggests that HemAssist, Polyheme, and Hemopure are associated with a significant level of cardiovascular dysfunction. The next generation of HBOCs remains under development.
机译:与获取和储存全血用于输血有关的并发症已经为开发血液替代品展开了巨大的努力。这些努力的历史涉及科学,道德和商业的复杂融合。这篇综述的重点是已发展到II或III期临床试验的三种基于血红蛋白的氧气载体(HBOC)的临床试验:He-mAssist(Baxter;美国伊利诺伊州Deerfield),PolyHeme(Northfield;美国伊利诺伊州埃文斯顿) )和Hemopure(Biopure;美国马萨诸塞州剑桥)。在围手术期进行的已发表的动物研究和临床试验表明,这些产品能够成功地运输和输送氧气,但所有产品都可能诱发高血压并导致意想不到的心输出量降低。总体而言,这些研究表明,HBOC在手术期间和之后仅能适度地节省血液,死亡率没有改善,并且不良反应的发生率也有所增加。迄今为止,这些围手术期研究的结果尚未获得监管机构的批准。相反,这三家公司都选择专注于在院前环境中对创伤患者进行大规模试验。在美国的一项试验因前100名患者的死亡率显着高于该水平的试验而被中止后,Baxter放弃了HemAssist的开发。用血液制品治疗的患者。诺斯菲尔德(Northfield)的PolyHeme试验表明,死亡率增加的趋势不显着,随后对血液的需求却很少下降。由于FDA对试验设计和研究依据的担忧,针对创伤患者的Biopure Hemopure测试已经暂停了数年。关于所有HBOC临床试验的设计和实施也引起了伦理关注。因此,现有证据表明HemAssist,Polyheme和Hemopure与心血管功能异常的严重程度有关。下一代HBOC仍在开发中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号