首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Malaria Journal >Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiaemolecular form identification
【2h】

Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiaemolecular form identification

机译:比较分析揭示了冈比亚按蚊分子形态鉴定常用方法结果之间的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAnopheles gambiae M and S molecular forms, the major malaria vectors in the Afro-tropical region, are ongoing a process of ecological diversification and adaptive lineage splitting, which is affecting malaria transmission and vector control strategies in West Africa. These two incipient species are defined on the basis of single nucleotide differences in the IGS and ITS regions of multicopy rDNA located on the X-chromosome. A number of PCR and PCR-RFLP approaches based on form-specific SNPs in the IGS region are used for M and S identification. Moreover, a PCR-method to detect the M-specific insertion of a short interspersed transposable element (SINE200) has recently been introduced as an alternative identification approach. However, a large-scale comparative analysis of four widely used PCR or PCR-RFLP genotyping methods for M and S identification was never carried out to evaluate whether they could be used interchangeably, as commonly assumed.
机译:背景冈比亚按蚊的M和S分子形式是非洲热带地区的主要疟疾媒介,目前正在进行生态多样化和适应性谱系分裂的过程,这正在影响西非的疟疾传播和媒介控制策略。基于位于X染色体上的多拷贝rDNA的IGS和ITS区域中的单核苷酸差异,定义了这两个初始物种。许多基于IGS区域中形式特异性SNP的PCR和PCR-RFLP方法可用于M和S鉴定。此外,最近已经引入了一种PCR方法来检测短散布的转座因子(SINE200)的M特异性插入,作为一种替代的识别方法。但是,从没有像以往那样对用于M和S鉴定的四种广泛使用的PCR或PCR-RFLP基因分型方法进行大规模比较分析,以评估它们是否可以互换使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号