首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Malaria Research and Treatment >Assessment of Clinical Diagnosis Microscopy Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum in Nigeria
【2h】

Assessment of Clinical Diagnosis Microscopy Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum in Nigeria

机译:尼日利亚恶性疟原虫的临床诊断显微镜检查快速诊断检测和聚合酶链反应评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compares the performance of clinical diagnosis and three laboratory diagnostic methods (thick film microscopy (TFM), rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum in Nigeria. Using clinical criteria, 217 children were recruited into the study out of which 106 (48.8%) were positive by TFM, 84 (38.7%) by RDT, and 125 (57.6%) by PCR. Using a composite reference method generated from the three diagnostic methods, 71 (32.7%) patients were found to be truly infected and 90 (41.5%) truly uninfected, while 56 (25.8%) were misidentified as infected or noninfected. When each of the 3 diagnostic methods was compared with the composite reference, PCR had sensitivity of 97.3%, specificity of 62.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 56.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.8%; microscopy had sensitivity of 77.2%, specificity of 72%, PPV of 66.9%, and NPV of 81.1%, while RDT had sensitivity of 62.3%, specificity of 87.4%, PPV of 67.7%, and NPV of 84.5%. PCR test performed best among the three methods followed by TFM and RDT in that order. The result of this study shows that clinical diagnosis cannot be relied upon for accurate diagnosis of P. falciparum in endemic areas.
机译:本研究比较了在尼日利亚诊断恶性疟原虫的临床诊断和三种实验室诊断方法(厚膜显微镜(TFM),快速诊断测试(RDT)和聚合酶链反应(PCR))的性能。根据临床标准,招募了217名儿童进入研究,其中TFM阳性106名(48.8%),RDT阳性84名(38.7%),PCR阳性125名(57.6%)。使用这三种诊断方法产生的复合参考方法,发现71名(32.7%)真正感染了患者,90例(41.5%)真正未被感染,而56名(25.8%)被误认为是感染或未感染。当将三种诊断方法中的每一种与复合参考进行比较时,PCR的敏感性为97.3%,特异性为62.5%,阳性预测值(PPV)为56.8%,阴性预测值(NPV)为97.8%;显微镜的敏感性为77.2%,特异性为72%,PPV为66.9%,NPV为81.1%,而RDT的敏感性为62.3%,特异性为87.4%,PPV为67.7%,NPV为84.5%。 PCR测试在三种方法中表现最好,其次是TFM和RDT。这项研究的结果表明,不能依靠临床诊断来准确诊断流行地区的恶性疟原虫。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号