Background: The search for effective antimicrobial agents to mitigate peri-implant infections remains a crucial aspect of implant dentistry. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of i-PRF, A-PRF+, and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on decontaminated rough and smooth titanium (Ti) discs. Materials and Methods: Rough and smooth Ti discs were coated with multispecies biofilm and thoroughly debrided using a chitosan-bristled brush. Subsequently, i-PRF, A-PRF+, and EMD were applied. Untreated discs served as control. Residual adherent bacteria present on the treated Ti discs were visualized by SEM and quantified using culture technique, and colony-forming units (CFUs) were measured after 48 h and 7 days. Results: i-PRF demonstrated better antimicrobial effectiveness on both smooth and rough implant surfaces as compared to A-PRF+ and EMD (p < 0.001). In all the experimental groups, smooth Ti discs displayed a greater reduction in microbes compared to rough Ti discs when treated with the biologics. The major reduction in CFU values was determined after seven days. Conclusions: i-PRF as a regenerative material may also be suitable for decontaminating implant surfaces, which could influence tissue healing and regenerative outcomes positively.
展开▼
机译:背景:寻找有效的抗菌剂来减轻种植体周围感染仍然是种植牙的一个重要方面。本研究旨在评估和比较 i-PRF 、 A-PRF+ 和牙釉质基质衍生物 (EMD) 对去污的粗糙和光滑钛 (Ti) 椎间盘的抗菌效果。材料和方法: 粗糙光滑的 Ti 盘涂上多物种生物膜,并使用壳聚糖毛刷彻底清创。随后,应用 i-PRF 、 A-PRF+ 和 EMD。未处理的椎间盘作为对照。通过 SEM 观察处理过的 Ti 圆盘上存在的残留粘附细菌,并使用培养技术进行定量,并在 48 小时和 7 天后测量菌落形成单位 (CFU)。结果:与 A-PRF+ 和 EMD 相比,i-PRF 在光滑和粗糙的种植体表面均显示出更好的抗菌效果 (p < 0.001)。在所有实验组中,当用生物制剂处理时,与粗糙的 Ti 盘相比,光滑的 Ti 盘显示出更大的微生物减少。7 天后确定 CFU 值的主要降低。结论:i-PRF 作为一种再生材料也可能适用于净化植入物表面,这可能会对组织愈合和再生结果产生积极影响。
展开▼