首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Eplasty >The Increasing Problem of Wound Bacterial Burden and Infection in Acute and Chronic Soft-Tissue Wounds Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
【2h】

The Increasing Problem of Wound Bacterial Burden and Infection in Acute and Chronic Soft-Tissue Wounds Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

机译:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的急性和慢性软组织伤口的细菌负担和感染的增加问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a leading cause of colonization and infection in both acute and chronic soft-tissue wounds. >Objective: Our objective is to define this current epidemic problem caused by both community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) and hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA), focusing on the similarities and differences between these 2 isolates as well as the impact on wound management decisions. >Methods: Methods used include a literature review on the growth of the current MRSA problem and its International scope. In addition, a current up-to-date assessment had been made of the problem and the current approach to management of MRSA in acute soft-tissue and chronic wounds. Burns are not discussed because this injury usually does not fit either categories and is managed quite uniquely. >Results: Results included the following: (1) There are very distinct properties of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA, which must be considered for acute and chronic wound care. Management of both requires rigorous barrier precaution techniques to avoid cross-contamination. The presence of MRSA as a carrier state increases the risk of both a systemic and local wound infection in the carrier. There are large and increasing reservoirs of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA worldwide leading to more bacteremias and wound problems. Topical antimicrobial therapy has not been addressed in managing MRSA in acute and chronic wounds. >Conclusion: Conclusions include the fact that both HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA wound infections are rapidly increasing, especially with CA-MRSA. This high incidence requires appropriate wound prediction and management decisions as well as attempts to avoid further cross-contamination and reservoir growth. Topical antimicrobial therapy would seem to be an important component in controlling this tremendous problem. Yet this topic has yet to be adequately addressed.
机译:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)已成为急性和慢性软组织伤口定植和感染的主要原因。 >目标:我们的目标是定义当前由社区获得性MRSA(CA-MRSA)和医院获得性MRSA(HA-MRSA)引起的当前流行病,着重探讨这2种疾病之间的异同隔离以及对伤口管理决策的影响。 >方法:使用的方法包括对当前MRSA问题的发展及其国际范围的文献综述。此外,目前已经对该问题以及急性软组织和慢性伤口中MRSA的当前治疗方法进行了最新评估。烧伤没有讨论,因为这种损伤通常不适合这两种类型,并且处理得非常独特。 >结果:结果包括:(1)CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA具有非常不同的特性,急性和慢性伤口护理必须考虑这些特性。两者的管理都需要严格的屏障预防技术,以避免交叉污染。 MRSA作为载体状态的存在会增加载体中全身和局部伤口感染的风险。世界各地都有大量且不断增加的CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA储存库,导致更多的细菌血症和伤口问题。在急性和慢性伤口中管理MRSA尚未解决局部抗菌治疗的问题。 >结论:结论包括以下事实:HA-MRSA和CA-MRSA伤口感染都在迅速增加,尤其是CA-MRSA。这种高发生率需要适当的伤口预测和处理决策,并试图避免进一步的交叉污染和储库生长。局部抗菌治疗似乎是控制这个巨大问题的重要组成部分。然而,这个话题尚未得到适当的解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号