首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Foods >What Is Natural? Consumer Responses to Selected Ingredients
【2h】

What Is Natural? Consumer Responses to Selected Ingredients

机译:什么是天然?消费者对某些成分的反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Interest in “natural” food has grown enormously over the last decade. Because the United States government has not set a legal definition for the term “natural”, customers have formed their own sensory perceptions and opinions on what constitutes natural. In this study, we examined 20 ingredients to determine what consumers consider to be natural. Using a national database, 630 consumers were sampled (50% male and 50% female) online, and the results were analyzed using percentages and chi-square tests. No ingredient was considered natural by more than 69% of respondents. We found evidence that familiarity may play a major role in consumers’ determination of naturalness. We also found evidence that chemical sounding names and the age of the consumer have an effect on whether an ingredient and potentially a food is considered natural. Interestingly, a preference towards selecting GMO (genetically modified organisms) foods had no significant impact on perceptions of natural.
机译:在过去十年中,人们对“天然”食品的兴趣大大增加。由于美国政府尚未为“自然”一词设定法律定义,因此客户已对构成自然的东西形成了自己的感官感知和见解。在这项研究中,我们检查了20种成分,以确定消费者认为什么是天然的。使用国家数据库,在线抽取了630名消费者(男性占50%,女性占50%),并使用百分比和卡方检验对结果进行了分析。超过69%的受访者认为没有成分是天然的。我们发现有证据表明,熟悉度可能在消费者确定自然性方面起主要作用。我们还发现有证据表明,化学名称和消费者年龄会影响成分和潜在食物是否被视为天然食物。有趣的是,偏爱选择转基因(GMO)食品对自然感知没有显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号