首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >The Three Models of Emotional Intelligence and Performance in a Hot and Cool goo-go Task in Undergraduate Students
【2h】

The Three Models of Emotional Intelligence and Performance in a Hot and Cool goo-go Task in Undergraduate Students

机译:大学生冷热去/不去任务中情商和表现的三种模式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Emotional intelligence (EI), or the ability to perceive, use, understand and regulate emotions, appears to be helpful in the performance of “hot” (i.e., emotionally laden) cognitive tasks when using performance-based ability models, but not when using self-report EI models. The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between EI (as measured through a performance-based ability test, a self-report mixed test and a self-report ability test) and cognitive control ability during the performance of hot and “cool” (i.e., non-emotionally laden) “goo-go” tasks. An experimental design was used for this study in which 187 undergraduate students (25% men) with a mean age of 21.93 years (standard deviation [SD] = 3.8) completed the three EI tests of interest (Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test [MSCEIT], Trait Meta-Mood Scale [TMMS] and Emotional Quotient Inventory–Short Form [EQi:S]) as well as goo-go tasks using faces and geometric figures as stimuli. The results provide evidence for negative associations between the “managing” branch of EI measured through the performance-based ability test of EI and the cognitive control index of the hot goo-go task, although similar evidence was not found when using the cool task. Further, the present study failed to observe consistent results when using the self-report EI instruments. These findings are discussed in terms of both the validity and implications of the various EI models.
机译:当使用基于绩效的能力模型时,情绪智力(EI)或感知,使用,理解和调节情绪的能力似乎有助于执行“热”(即充满情感)的认知任务,而在使用时则无济于事自我报告EI模型。这项研究的目的是分析EI(通过基于绩效的能力测验,自我报告混合测验和自我报告能力测验测得)与热和“凉”表现期间的认知控制能力之间的关系。 (即,没有情感负担)“执行/不执行”任务。本实验采用实验设计,其中187名平均年龄为21.93岁(标准差[SD] = 3.8)的大学生(25%的男性)完成了三项感兴趣的EI测试(Mayer-Salovey-Caruso情绪智力测试) [MSCEIT],特质元情绪量表[TMMS]和情绪商量表-简表[EQi:S])以及使用面孔和几何图形作为刺激的执行/不执行任务。结果提供了证据,表明通过基于绩效的EI能力测试测得的EI“管理”分支与热/不执行任务的认知控制指数之间存在负相关关系,尽管使用冷任务。此外,本研究在使用自我报告EI仪器时未能观察到一致的结果。从各种EI模型的有效性和含意性方面讨论了这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号