首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Frontal and occipital-parietal alpha oscillations distinguish between stimulus conflict and response conflict
【2h】

Frontal and occipital-parietal alpha oscillations distinguish between stimulus conflict and response conflict

机译:额叶和枕顶叶阿尔法振荡区分刺激冲突和反应冲突

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conflicts between target and distraction can occur at the level of both stimulus and response processing. However, the neural oscillations underlying occurrence of the interference in different levels have not been understood well. Here, we reveal such a neural oscillation modulation by combining a 4:2 mapping design (two targets are mapped into one response key) with a practice paradigm (pretest, practice, and posttest) when healthy human participants were performing a novel color-word flanker task. Response time (RT) results revealed constant stimulus conflict (SC, stimulus incongruent minus congruent, SI-CO) but increased response conflict (RC, response incongruent minus stimulus incongruent, RI-SI) with practice. Event-related potential (ERP) results demonstrated stable P3 amplitude differences for the SI-CO in the centro-parietal region across practice, which may reflect maintenance of the stimulus processing; and significantly larger P3 amplitudes in the same region for the RI relative to SI trial type in posttest, which may reflect inhibition of the distraction response. Further, neural oscillatory results showed that with practice, the lower alpha band in the frontal region and the upper alpha band in the occipital-parietal region distinguished between stimulus- and response-conflicts, respectively, suggesting that practice reduces the alertness (sensitiveness) of the brain to conflict occurrence, and enhances stimulus-response associations.
机译:目标和注意力分散之间的冲突可能同时发生在刺激和反应处理的水平上。但是,人们对不同级别的干扰发生背后的神经振荡还没有很好的理解。在这里,我们将健康的人类参与者在执行新颖的颜色词时,通过将4:2映射设计(将两个目标映射到一个响应键中)与实践范式(预测试,实践和后测试)相结合,揭示了这种神经振荡调制。侧翼任务。响应时间(RT)结果显示,实践中持续存在刺激冲突(SC,刺激不一致减负一致,SI-CO),但响应冲突增加(RC,响应不一致减负刺激不一致,RI-SI)。事件相关电位(ERP)结果表明,整个练习过程中中心顶区SI-CO的P3幅度稳定,这可能反映了刺激过程的维持。相对于SI试验类型,RI在相同区域中的P3振幅在后期测试中要大得多,这可能反映出干扰反应的抑制。此外,神经振荡结果表明,在练习中,额叶下部的α带和枕顶部分的上部α带在刺激和反应冲突之间是有区别的,这表明练习会降低刺激的反应性(敏感性)。大脑发生冲突,并增强刺激反应的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号