首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation to homologous language regions as an adjunct to speech and language therapy in post-stroke aphasia: a meta-analysis
【2h】

Inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation to homologous language regions as an adjunct to speech and language therapy in post-stroke aphasia: a meta-analysis

机译:脑卒中后失语症的抑制性非侵入性脑刺激对同源语言区域的语音和语言治疗的辅助:一项荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Chronic communication impairment is common after stroke, and conventional speech and language therapy (SLT) strategies have limited effectiveness in post-stroke aphasia. Neurorehabilitation with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (NIBS)—particularly repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—may enhance the effects of SLT in selected patients. Applying inhibitory NIBS to specific homologous language regions may induce neural reorganization and reduce interhemispheric competition. This mini review highlights randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and randomized cross-over trials using low-frequency rTMS or cathodal tDCS over the non-lesioned non-language dominant hemisphere and performs an exploratory meta-analysis of those trials considered combinable. Using a random-effects model, a meta-analysis of nine eligible trials involving 215 participants showed a significant mean effect size of 0.51 (95% CI = 0.24–0.79) for the main outcome “accuracy of naming” in language assessment. No heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 0%). More multicenter RCTs with larger populations and homogenous intervention protocols are required to confirm these and the longer-term effects.
机译:卒中后慢性沟通障碍很常见,传统的言语和语言治疗(SLT)策略在卒中后失语症的疗效有限。使用非侵入性脑刺激技术(NIBS)进行的神经康复-特别是重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)或经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)-可能会增强所选患者的SLT疗效。将抑制性NIBS应用于特定的同源语言区域可能会诱导神经重组并减少半球竞争。本小型回顾着重介绍了在非病变非语言优势半球上使用低频rTMS或阴极tDCS进行的随机对照试验(RCT)和随机交叉试验,并对那些认为可合并的试验进行了探索性荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型,对涉及215名参与者的9项合格试验的荟萃分析显示,语言评估的主要结果“命名准确性”的平均均值大小为0.51(95%CI = 0.24-0.79)。没有观察到异质性(I 2 = 0%)。需要更多的具有更大人口的多中心RCT和同质的干预方案来确认这些以及长期影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号