首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >The effects of automated artifact removal algorithms on electroencephalography-based Alzheimers disease diagnosis
【2h】

The effects of automated artifact removal algorithms on electroencephalography-based Alzheimers disease diagnosis

机译:自动去除伪影算法在基于脑电图的阿尔茨海默氏病诊断中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the last decade, electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a reliable tool for the diagnosis of cortical disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). EEG signals, however, are susceptible to several artifacts, such as ocular, muscular, movement, and environmental. To overcome this limitation, existing diagnostic systems commonly depend on experienced clinicians to manually select artifact-free epochs from the collected multi-channel EEG data. Manual selection, however, is a tedious and time-consuming process, rendering the diagnostic system “semi-automated.” Notwithstanding, a number of EEG artifact removal algorithms have been proposed in the literature. The (dis)advantages of using such algorithms in automated AD diagnostic systems, however, have not been documented; this paper aims to fill this gap. Here, we investigate the effects of three state-of-the-art automated artifact removal (AAR) algorithms (both alone and in combination with each other) on AD diagnostic systems based on four different classes of EEG features, namely, spectral, amplitude modulation rate of change, coherence, and phase. The three AAR algorithms tested are statistical artifact rejection (SAR), blind source separation based on second order blind identification and canonical correlation analysis (BSS-SOBI-CCA), and wavelet enhanced independent component analysis (wICA). Experimental results based on 20-channel resting-awake EEG data collected from 59 participants (20 patients with mild AD, 15 with moderate-to-severe AD, and 24 age-matched healthy controls) showed the wICA algorithm alone outperforming other enhancement algorithm combinations across three tasks: diagnosis (control vs. mild vs. moderate), early detection (control vs. mild), and disease progression (mild vs. moderate), thus opening the doors for fully-automated systems that can assist clinicians with early detection of AD, as well as disease severity progression assessment.
机译:在过去的十年中,脑电图(EEG)已经成为诊断诸如阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)等皮质疾病的可靠工具。然而,EEG信号易受多种伪影的影响,例如眼,肌肉,运动和环境。为了克服该限制,现有的诊断系统通常依赖经验丰富的临床医生从收集的多通道EEG数据中手动选择无伪影的时期。但是,手动选择是一个繁琐且耗时的过程,使诊断系统成为“半自动化”。尽管如此,文献中已经提出了许多EEG伪影去除算法。但是,尚未在自动AD诊断系统中使用此类算法的(缺点)记录在案;本文旨在填补这一空白。在这里,我们基于四种不同的EEG特征类别,即频谱,振幅,研究了三种最先进的自动伪像去除(AAR)算法(单独使用和彼此结合使用)对AD诊断系统的影响变化,相干和相位的调制率。测试的三种AAR算法是统计伪像抑制(SAR),基于二阶盲识别和规范相关分析的盲源分离(BSS-SOBI-CCA)和小波增强的独立分量分析(wICA)。根据从59位参与者(20位轻度AD,15位中度至重度AD和24位年龄匹配的健康对照组)的参与者收集的20通道静息EEG数据进行的实验结果表明,仅wICA算法的性能优于其他增强算法组合涵盖三个任务:诊断(对照vs.轻度与中度),早期检测(对照vs.轻度)和疾病进展(轻度与中度),从而为全自动系统打开了大门,该系统可协助临床医生及早发现AD以及疾病严重程度评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号