首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >What Comes First: Return to School or Return to Activity for Youth After Concussion? Maybe We Dont Have to Choose
【2h】

What Comes First: Return to School or Return to Activity for Youth After Concussion? Maybe We Dont Have to Choose

机译:首先是什么:脑震荡后重返学校或重返青年活动?也许我们不必选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: Return to School (RTS) and Return to Activity/Play (RTA) protocols are important in concussion management. Minimal evidence exists as to sequence and whether progression can occur simultaneously. Experts recommend that children/youth fully return to school before beginning RTA protocols. This study investigates recovery trajectories of children/youth while following RTA and RTS protocols simultaneously, with the following objectives: (1) to compare rates and patterns of progression through the stages of both protocols; (2) to evaluate symptom trajectories of youth post-concussion while progressing through stages of RTS and RTA; and (3) to propose a new model for concussion management in youth that involves the integration of Return to Activity and Return to School protocols.>Methods: In a 3-year prospective-cohort study of 139 children/youth aged 5–18 years with concussive injury, self-reported symptoms using PCSS and stage of protocols were evaluated every 48 h using electronic surveys until full return to school and activity/sport were attained. Information regarding school accommodation and achievement was collected.>Results: Sample mean age is 13 years, 46% male. Youth are returning to school with accommodations significantly quicker than RTA (p = 0.001). Significant negative correlations between total PCSS score and stage of RTS protocol were found at: 1-week (r = −0.376, p < 0.0001; r = −0.317, p = 0.0003), 1-month (r = −0.483, p < 0.0001; r = −0.555, p < 0.0001), and 3-months (r = −0.598, p < 0.0001; r = −0.617, p < 0.0001); indicating lower symptom scores correlated with higher guideline stages. Median full return to school time is 35 days with 21% of youth symptomatic at full return. Median return time to full sport competition is 38 days with 15% still symptomatic. Sixty-four percent of youth reported experiencing school problems during recovery and 30% at symptom resolution, with 31% reporting a drop in their grades during recovery and 18% at study completion.>Conclusions: Children/youth return to school faster than they return to play in spite of the self-reported, school-related symptoms they experience while moving through the protocols. Youth can progress simultaneously through the RTS and RTA protocols during stages 1–3. Considering the numbers of youth having school difficulties post-concussion, full contact sport, stage 6, of RTA, should be delayed until full and successful reintegration back to school has been achieved. In light of the huge variability in recovery, determining how to resume participation in activities despite ongoing symptoms is still the challenge for each individual child. There is much to be learned with further research needed in this area.
机译:>目标:重返学校(RTS)和重返活动/娱乐(RTA)协议在脑震荡管理中很重要。关于序列以及进展是否可以同时发生的证据很少。专家建议在开始RTA协议之前,儿童/青少年应完全返回学校。这项研究调查了同时遵循RTA和RTS方案的儿童/青少年的恢复轨迹,其目标如下:(1)比较两种方案各个阶段的进展速度和模式; (2)评估青少年脑震荡在经历RTS和RTA阶段时的症状轨迹; (3)提出一种针对青少年脑震荡的新模型,其中涉及“重返活动”和“重返学校”方案的整合。>方法:在一项针对139名儿童/年龄为5-18岁的脑震荡青年,每48小时使用电子调查评估PCSS自我报告的症状和方案的阶段,直到完全返回学校并获得活动/运动。收集了有关学校住宿和成就的信息。>结果:样本平均年龄为13岁,男性占46%。年轻人返回学校的住宿明显快于RTA(p = 0.001)。 PCSS总评分与RTS方案阶段之间存在显着的负相关关系:1周(r = -0.376,p <0.0001; r = -0.317,p = 0.0003),1个月(r = -0.483,p < 0.0001; r = -0.555,p <0.0001)和3个月(r = -0.598,p <0.0001; r = -0.617,p <0.0001);表示症状评分较低与较高的指导阶段相关。完全返校时间的中位数为35天,其中21%的青少年在完全返校时有症状。参加全面运动比赛的中位时间为38天,其中15%仍然有症状。 64%的青年报告称在恢复期间遇到学校问题,30%的症状得到解决,其中31%的报告称他们在恢复过程中成绩下降,18%的人在研究结束时出现成绩。>结论:儿童/青少年返回尽管他们在遵循协议过程中遇到自我报告的,与学校相关的症状,但上学的速度要比他们返回游戏的速度快。青年可以在1-3阶段通过RTS和RTA协议同时进步。考虑到脑震荡后有学校困难的青年人数,应将RTA第6阶段的充分接触运动推迟到完全和成功地重返学校之前。鉴于康复的巨大差异,尽管有持续的症状,但如何确定如何继续参加活动仍然是每个孩子面临的挑战。在该领域需要进行进一步的研究,有很多东西要学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号