首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >Low Consistency of Four Brain Connectivity Measures Derived from Intracranial Electrode Measurements
【2h】

Low Consistency of Four Brain Connectivity Measures Derived from Intracranial Electrode Measurements

机译:从颅内电极测量得出的四种大脑连通性指标的一致性很低

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Measures of brain connectivity are currently subject to intense scientific and clinical interest. Multiple measures are available, each with advantages and disadvantages. Here, we study epilepsy patients with intracranial electrodes, and compare four different measures of connectivity. Perhaps the most direct measure derives from intracranial electrodes; however, this is invasive and spatial coverage is incomplete. These electrodes can be actively stimulated to trigger electrophysical responses to provide the first measure of connectivity. A second measure is the recent development of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and intracranial electrode stimulation. The resulting BOLD maps form a measure of effective connectivity. A third measure uses low frequency BOLD fluctuations measured by MRI, with functional connectivity defined as the temporal correlation coefficient between their BOLD waveforms. A fourth measure is structural, derived from diffusion MRI, with connectivity defined as an integrated diffusivity measure along a connecting pathway. This method addresses the difficult requirement to measure connectivity between any two points in the brain, reflecting the relatively arbitrary location of the surgical placement of intracranial electrodes. Using a group of eight epilepsy patients with intracranial electrodes, the connectivity from one method is compared to another method using all paired data points that are in common, yielding an overall correlation coefficient. This method is performed for all six paired-comparisons between the four methods. While these show statistically significant correlations, the magnitudes of the correlation are relatively modest (r2 between 0.20 and 0.001). In summary, there are many pairs of points in the brain that correlate well using one measure yet correlate poorly using another measure. These experimental findings present a complicated picture regarding the measure or meaning of brain connectivity.
机译:目前,大脑连通性的测量受到了强烈的科学和临床关注。可以采取多种措施,每种措施各有利弊。在这里,我们研究癫痫患者颅内电极,并比较四种不同的连通性度量。也许最直接的措施来自颅内电极。但是,这是侵入性的,空间覆盖不完整。可以积极刺激这些电极以触发电物理响应,以提供连通性的第一个度量。第二个措施是同时进行BOLD fMRI和颅内电极刺激的最新进展。生成的BOLD映射形成有效连接的度量。第三种量度使用通过MRI测量的低频BOLD波动,其功能连通性定义为其BOLD波形之间的时间相关系数。第四个量度是从扩散MRI得出的结构性,其连通性定义为沿着连接路径的综合扩散性量度。该方法解决了测量大脑中任意两个点之间的连通性的困难要求,反映了颅内电极手术位置的相对任意位置。使用一组八名带有颅内电极的癫痫患者,使用所有共同的所有成对数据点将一种方法的连通性与另一种方法的连通性进行比较,从而得出整体相关系数。对四种方法之间的所有六个配对比较执行此方法。尽管这些在统计上显示出显着的相关性,但是相关性的大小相对较小(r 2 在0.20和0.001之间)。总而言之,大脑中有许多对点使用一种度量相关性很好,而使用另一种度量相关性很差。这些实验发现提出了关于大脑连接性的度量或含义的复杂图景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号