首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Classification of Healthy Subjects and Alzheimers Disease Patients with Dementia from Cortical Sources of Resting State EEG Rhythms: A Study Using Artificial Neural Networks
【2h】

Classification of Healthy Subjects and Alzheimers Disease Patients with Dementia from Cortical Sources of Resting State EEG Rhythms: A Study Using Artificial Neural Networks

机译:从静息状态脑电节律的皮层来源对痴呆症的健康受试者和阿尔茨海默氏病患者的分类:使用人工神经网络的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous evidence showed a 75.5% best accuracy in the classification of 120 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with dementia and 100 matched normal elderly (Nold) subjects based on cortical source current density and linear lagged connectivity estimated by eLORETA freeware from resting state eyes-closed electroencephalographic (rsEEG) rhythms (Babiloni et al., ). Specifically, that accuracy was reached using the ratio between occipital delta and alpha1 current density for a linear univariate classifier (receiver operating characteristic curves). Here we tested an innovative approach based on an artificial neural network (ANN) classifier from the same database of rsEEG markers. Frequency bands of interest were delta (2–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz Hz), alpha1 (8–10.5 Hz), and alpha2 (10.5–13 Hz). ANN classification showed an accuracy of 77% using the most 4 discriminative rsEEG markers of source current density (parietal theta/alpha 1, temporal theta/alpha 1, occipital theta/alpha 1, and occipital delta/alpha 1). It also showed an accuracy of 72% using the most 4 discriminative rsEEG markers of source lagged linear connectivity (inter-hemispherical occipital delta/alpha 2, intra-hemispherical right parietal-limbic alpha 1, intra-hemispherical left occipital-temporal theta/alpha 1, intra-hemispherical right occipital-temporal theta/alpha 1). With these 8 markers combined, an accuracy of at least 76% was reached. Interestingly, this accuracy based on 8 (linear) rsEEG markers as inputs to ANN was similar to that obtained with a single rsEEG marker (Babiloni et al., ), thus unveiling their information redundancy for classification purposes. In future AD studies, inputs to ANNs should include other classes of independent linear (i.e., directed transfer function) and non-linear (i.e., entropy) rsEEG markers to improve the classification.
机译:以前的证据显示,根据eLORETA免费软件通过静息闭眼估计的皮层源电流密度和线性滞后连通性,对120例老年痴呆症(AD)痴呆症患者和100例匹配的正常老年(Nold)受试者进行分类的最佳准确性为75.5%脑电图(rsEEG)节律(Babiloni et al。,)。具体而言,对于线性单变量分类器(接收器工作特性曲线),使用枕骨增量和alpha1电流密度之间的比率即可达到该精度。在这里,我们测试了基于rsEEG标记的同一数据库中基于人工神经网络(ANN)分类器的创新方法。感兴趣的频段是delta(2-4 Hz),theta(4-8 Hz Hz),alpha1(8-10.5 Hz)和alpha2(10.5-13Hz)。人工神经网络分类使用源电流密度的最多四个区分性rsEEG标记(顶叶theta / alpha 1,颞叶theta / alpha 1,枕叶theta / alpha 1和枕叶delta / alpha 1)显示了77%的准确度。使用源滞后线性连通性的最多4个判别rsEEG标记(半球后枕叶间三角洲/ alpha 2,半球内右顶叶-半边坡alpha 1,半球内左枕叶-颞theta / alpha),它的最新rsEEG标记也显示出72%的准确性1,半球内右枕-颞θ/α1)。结合使用这8个标记,可以达到至少76%的准确度。有趣的是,基于8个(线性)rsEEG标记作为ANN输入的精度与使用单个rsEEG标记获得的精度相似(Babiloni等,),从而揭示了它们用于分类目的的信息冗余。在未来的AD研究中,对ANN的输入应包括其他类别的独立线性(即有向传递函数)和非线性(即熵)rsEEG标记以改善分类。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号