首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Introduction and Utilization of High Priced HCV Medicines across Europe; Implications for the Future
【2h】

Introduction and Utilization of High Priced HCV Medicines across Europe; Implications for the Future

机译:在欧洲引入和使用高价丙肝疫苗;对未来的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Infection with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is a widespread transmittable disease with a diagnosed prevalence of 2.0%. Fortunately, it is now curable in most patients. Sales of medicines to treat HCV infection grew 2.7% per year between 2004 and 2011, enhanced by the launch of the protease inhibitors (PIs) boceprevir (BCV) and telaprevir (TVR) in addition to ribavirin and pegylated interferon (pegIFN). Costs will continue to rise with new treatments including sofosbuvir, which now include interferon free regimens.>Objective: Assess the uptake of BCV and TVR across Europe from a health authority perspective to offer future guidance on dealing with new high cost medicines.>Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study of medicines to treat HCV (pegIFN, ribavirin, BCV and TVR) among European countries from 2008 to 2013. Utilization measured in defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 patients/quarter (DIQs) and expenditure in Euros/DDD. Health authority activities to influence treatments categorized using the 4E methodology (Education, Engineering, Economics and Enforcement).>Results: Similar uptake of BCV and TVR among European countries and regions, ranging from 0.5 DIQ in Denmark, Netherlands and Slovenia to 1.5 DIQ in Tayside and Catalonia in 2013. However, different utilization of the new PIs vs. ribavirin indicates differences in dual vs. triple therapy, which is down to factors including physician preference and genotypes. Reimbursed prices for BCV and TVR were comparable across countries.>Conclusion: There was reasonable consistency in the utilization of BCV and TVR among European countries in comparison with other high priced medicines. This may reflect the social demand to limit the transmission of HCV. However, the situation is changing with new curative medicines for HCV genotype 1 (GT1) with potentially an appreciable budget impact. These concerns have resulted in different prices across countries, with their impact on budgets and patient outcomes monitored in the future to provide additional guidance.
机译:>背景:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染是一种广泛传播的疾病,诊断患病率为2.0%。幸运的是,现在大多数患者都可以治愈。从2004年到2011年,用于治疗HCV感染的药物的销售额每年增长2.7%,这是因为除了利巴韦林和聚乙二醇化干扰素(pegIFN)之外,还推出了蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)boceprevir(BCV)和telaprevir(TVR)。随着包括索非布韦在内的新疗法(现在包括无干扰素疗法)的使用,成本将继续上升。>目标:从卫生当局的角度评估整个欧洲对BCV和TVR的吸收情况,从而为应对新的高剂量提供指导>方法: 2008年至2013年间,欧洲国家/地区用于治疗HCV(pegIFN,利巴韦林,BCV和TVR)的药物的横断面描述性研究。以规定的每日剂量(DDDs)/ 1000测得的利用率患者/季度(DIQs)和支出(欧元/ DDD)。卫生当局的活动对使用4E方法(教育,工程,经济和执法)进行分类的治疗产生了影响。>结果:欧洲国家和地区对BCV和TVR的摄取量相近,范围从丹麦,荷兰的0.5 DIQ在2013年Tayside和加泰罗尼亚的斯洛文尼亚达到1.5 DIQ。但是,新PI与利巴韦林的不同利用表明双重治疗与三次治疗的差异,这取决于包括医生偏好和基因型在内的因素。 >结论:与其他高价药物相比,欧洲国家之间BCV和TVR的报销价格具有合理的一致性。这可能反映了限制HCV传播的社会需求。但是,随着HCV基因型1(GT1)的新型治疗药物的出现,这种情况正在发生变化,并可能对预算产生重大影响。这些担忧导致了各国之间不同的价格,它们对预算的影响以及将来对患者结果的监测将提供更多指导。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号