首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience >Cortical Activation during Landmark-Centered vs. Gaze-Centered Memory of Saccade Targets in the Human: An FMRI Study
【2h】

Cortical Activation during Landmark-Centered vs. Gaze-Centered Memory of Saccade Targets in the Human: An FMRI Study

机译:人类的扫视目标的地标中心与凝视中心的记忆过程中的皮质激活:功能磁共振成像研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A remembered saccade target could be encoded in egocentric coordinates such as gaze-centered, or relative to some external allocentric landmark that is independent of the target or gaze (landmark-centered). In comparison to egocentric mechanisms, very little is known about such a landmark-centered representation. Here, we used an event-related fMRI design to identify brain areas supporting these two types of spatial coding (i.e., landmark-centered vs. gaze-centered) for target memory during the Delay phase where only target location, not saccade direction, was specified. The paradigm included three tasks with identical display of visual stimuli but different auditory instructions: Landmark Saccade (remember target location relative to a visual landmark, independent of gaze), Control Saccade (remember original target location relative to gaze fixation, independent of the landmark), and a non-spatial control, Color Report (report target color). During the Delay phase, the Control and Landmark Saccade tasks activated overlapping areas in posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and frontal cortex as compared to the color control, but with higher activation in PPC for target coding in the Control Saccade task and higher activation in temporal and occipital cortex for target coding in Landmark Saccade task. Gaze-centered directional selectivity was observed in superior occipital gyrus and inferior occipital gyrus, whereas landmark-centered directional selectivity was observed in precuneus and midposterior intraparietal sulcus. During the Response phase after saccade direction was specified, the parietofrontal network in the left hemisphere showed higher activation for rightward than leftward saccades. Our results suggest that cortical activation for coding saccade target direction relative to a visual landmark differs from gaze-centered directional selectivity for target memory, from the mechanisms for other types of allocentric tasks, and from the directionally selective mechanisms for saccade planning and execution.
机译:可以将记住的扫视目标编码为以自我为中心的坐标,例如以凝视为中心,或相对于某些独立于目标或凝视的外部同素异域界标(以地标为中心)。与以自我为中心的机制相比,对这种以地标为中心的表示知之甚少。在这里,我们使用事件相关的功能磁共振成像设计来识别在延迟阶段(仅目标位置而不是扫视方向)支持目标记忆的这两种类型的空间编码(即,以地标中心与凝视中心为中心)的大脑区域。指定。该范例包括三个任务,它们具有相同的视觉刺激显示,但听觉指令不同:Landmark Saccade(记住相对于视觉界标的目标位置,独立于注视),Control Saccade(记住相对于凝视注视的原始目标位置,独立于地标) ,以及非空间控件“颜色报告”(报告目标颜色)。在延迟阶段,与色彩控制相比,Control和Landmark Saccade任务激活了顶顶后皮(PPC)和额叶皮层中的重叠区域,但是Control Saccade任务中的目标编码中PPC的激活率更高,而颞部的激活率更高。和枕皮质用于Landmark Saccade任务中的目标编码。在上枕骨和下枕骨中观察到以凝视为中心的方向选择性,而在枕前和顶中后沟中观察到以界标为中心的方向选择性。在指定扫视方向后的响应阶段中,左半球的顶额额叶网络显示出比左扫视更高的激活度。我们的研究结果表明,相对于视觉界标的扫视目标方向编码的皮层激活不同于针对目标记忆的凝视中心定向选择性,其他类型的同心异体任务的机制以及扫视计划和执行的方向选择性机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号