首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine >Identification of Frailty in Primary Care: Feasibility and Acceptability of Recommended Case Finding Tools Within a Primary Care Integrated Seniors’ Program
【2h】

Identification of Frailty in Primary Care: Feasibility and Acceptability of Recommended Case Finding Tools Within a Primary Care Integrated Seniors’ Program

机译:确定基层医疗的脆弱性:基层医疗综合老年人计划中推荐的病例发现工具的可行性和可接受性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Case finding for frailty is recommended as part of routine clinical practice. We aimed to test feasibility and acceptability of three recommended case finding tools in primary care as part of an integrated seniors’ program. >Method: Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy-7 (PRISMA-7), 4-m walk test, and electronic frailty index (eFI) were used as frailty case finding tools for a target population of community-dwelling seniors ≥65 years of age enrolled in a seniors’ program within an academic primary care clinic in Alberta, Canada. Feasibility was measured by percent completion rate and requirements for training/equipment/space/time, and acceptability by health care providers was measured using focus groups. >Results: Eighty-five patients underwent case finding and 16 health care providers participated in the focus groups. Completion rate for PRISMA-7, 4-m walk test, and eFI was 97.6%, 93%, and 100%, respectively. No special training or equipment was required for PRISMA-7; brief training, equipment, and space were required for 4-m walk test. Both tools took less than 5 min to complete. Despite eFI requiring 10 to 20 min/patient chart, providers found it less intrusive. >Conclusion: Despite feasibility of the tests, acceptance was higher for tools with minimal clinic interruption, low requirements for resources, and those with added benefit.
机译:>背景:建议将发现脆弱的病例作为常规临床实践的一部分。我们的目标是测试三项推荐的案例发现工具在初级保健中的可行性和可接受性,作为综合老年人计划的一部分。 >方法:整合了用于维护Autonomy-7的服务的研究计划(PRISMA-7),4-m行走测试和电子脆弱指数(eFI)被用作针对某人的脆弱案例发现工具。在加拿大艾伯塔省的一家学术性初级保健诊所内,针对年龄≥65岁的社区居住老年人的目标人群进行了老年项目注册。以完成率百分比和对培训/设备/空间/时间的要求来衡量可行性,并使用焦点小组来衡量医疗保健提供者的可接受性。 >结果:85位患者进行了病例发现,有16位医疗保健提供者参加了焦点小组。 PRISMA-7、4-m步行测试和eFI的完成率分别为97.6%,93%和100%。 PRISMA-7不需要特殊的培训或设备; 4-m步行测试需要简短的培训,设备和空间。两种工具均用时不到5分钟即可完成。尽管eFI要求每位患者病历10至20分钟,但提供者发现它的干扰性较小。 >结论:尽管测试可行,但对于临床中断最少,对资源的要求低以及具有额外收益的工具,接受度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号