首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Global Health: Science and Practice >Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices
【2h】

Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices

机译:强化食品的监管监测:确定障碍和良好做法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While fortification of staple foods and condiments has gained enormous global traction, poor performance persists throughout many aspects of implementation, most notably around the critical element of regulatory monitoring, which is essential for ensuring foods meet national fortification standards. Where coverage of fortified foods is high, limited nutritional impact of fortification programs largely exists due to regulatory monitoring that insufficiently identifies and holds producers accountable for underfortified products. Based on quality assurance data from 20 national fortification programs in 12 countries, we estimate that less than half of the samples are adequately fortified against relevant national standards. In this paper, we outline key findings from a literature review, key informant interviews with 11 fortification experts, and semi-quantitative surveys with 39 individuals from regulatory agencies and the food fortification industry in 17 countries on the perceived effectiveness of regulatory monitoring systems and barriers to compliance against national fortification standards. Findings highlight that regulatory agencies and industry disagree on the value that enforcement mechanisms have in ensuring compliance against standards. Perceived political risk of enforcement and poorly resourced inspectorate capacity appear to adversely reinforce each other within an environment of unclear legislation to create a major hurdle for improving overall compliance of fortification programs against national standards. Budget constraints affect the ability of regulatory agencies to create a well-trained inspector cadre and improve the detection and enforcement of non-compliant and underfortified products. Recommendations to improve fortification compliance include improving technical capacity; ensuring sustained leadership, accountability, and funding in both the private and the public sectors; and removing political barriers to ensure consistent detection of underfortified products and enforcement of applicable fortification standards. Only by taking concrete steps to improve the entire regulatory system that is built on a cooperative working relationship between regulatory agencies and food producers will a nutrition strategy that uses fortification see its intended health effects.
机译:虽然主食和调味品的防伪在全球范围内获得了广泛的关注,但在实施的许多方面仍然表现不佳,尤其是在监管监控的关键要素周围,这对于确保食品符合国家防伪标准至关重要。在强化食品覆盖率很高的地方,由于监管监控未能充分识别强化食品并让生产商对劣质产品负责,因此强化计划在营养方面的影响很大。根据来自12个国家/地区的20个国家设防计划的质量保证数据,我们估计不到一半的样品已根据相关国家标准得到了适当的强化。在本文中,我们概述了文献综述,对11位设防专家进行的关键知情人访谈以及对17个国家的监管机构和食品强化行业的39个人进行的半定量调查,这些调查涉及监管监测系统和壁垒的感知有效性遵守国家防御工事标准。调查结果表明,监管机构和行业界对执行机制在确保遵守标准方面的价值存在分歧。在立法不明确的环境下,人们认为执法的政治风险和资源贫乏的视察机构似乎相互不利地加强了彼此之间的障碍,从而为提高防御工事方案对国家标准的总体遵守程度创造了主要障碍。预算限制会影响监管机构创建训练有素的检查员干部的能力,并改善对不合格和不合格产品的检测和执行。改善防御工事的建议包括提高技术能力;确保私营部门和公共部门的持续领导,问责制和资金;并消除政治障碍,以确保持续检测到劣势产品并执行适用的设防标准。只有采取具体步骤来改善建立在监管机构与食品生产商之间的合作工作关系基础上的整个监管体系,使用强化的营养策略才能看到其预期的健康影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号