首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Hygiene and Infection Control >Reprocessing of dental instruments in washer-disinfectors: does a representative test soil exist in dentistry?
【2h】

Reprocessing of dental instruments in washer-disinfectors: does a representative test soil exist in dentistry?

机译:清洗消毒器中牙科器械的后处理:牙科中是否存在代表性的测试土壤?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Reprocessing of medical devices, being classified as semi-critical B is recommended to be performed in a washer-disinfector. In order to estimate, whether the expected contaminants of the various medical disciplines can be effectively removed by this washer-disinfector, different so called “test soils” have been proposed to be tested as a marker of cleaning efficacy of the disinfector. Todays described test soils are optimised for the testing of contaminations occurring in surgical procedures, but not for dental procedures.>Methods: In this study the test soils being proposed in the EN 15883-5 (e.g. KMNE soil, recipe by Koller and coagulated sheep’s blood) were compared with 8 reference substances used in the conservative-prosthetic dental practice. The success of the cleaning efficacy in the washer-disinfector was checked visually and by determining the residual protein concentration on the contaminated instruments after the cleaning procedure. >Results: It could be shown that in contrast to the proposed test soils of the EN 15883-5, the used reference substances of the dental practice could not be removed by the washer-disinfector. Removal of these reference substances was only possible after manual or ultrasonic cleaning. >Conclusions: Since blood plays a subordinate role as a contaminant of instruments during conservative-prosthetic dental treatments, testing of the cleaning efficacy of the washer-disinfector with test soils according to the proposals of the EN 15883-5 is not representative in this discipline of dentistry. Most of the materials used in dental practice can only be removed manually or with the help of the ultrasound bath.
机译:>背景:建议在清洗消毒器中对属于半临界B级的医疗器械进行后处理。为了估计该清洗消毒器是否可以有效去除各种医学学科的预期污染物,已经提出了不同的所谓“测试污垢”作为杀菌消毒器清洁功效的标志。今天描述的测试土壤已经过优化,可用于测试手术过程中发生的污染物,但不适用于牙科手术。>方法:在这项研究中,EN 15883-5中提出的测试土壤(例如KMNE土壤,将考勒(Koller)的配方和凝结的羊血)与8种在保守义齿修复术中使用的参考物质进行比较。目视检查清洗消毒器中清洗效果的成功与否,并通过确定清洗程序后被污染器械上的残留蛋白质浓度来进行检查。 >结果:可以证明,与提议的EN 15883-5测试土壤相反,牙科消毒所使用的参考物质无法通过清洗消毒器去除。仅在手动或超声清洁后才能除去这些参考物质。 >结论:由于血液在保守义齿修复过程中起着器械污染物的次要作用,因此请根据EN 15883-5的建议使用测试污垢测试清洗消毒器的清洁效力在该牙科学科中不具有代表性。牙科实践中使用的大多数材料只能手动清除或在超声波浴的帮助下清除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号