首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Haematologica >Retrospective matched-pairs analysis of bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus bortezomib monotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma
【2h】

Retrospective matched-pairs analysis of bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus bortezomib monotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma

机译:硼替佐米联合地塞米松与硼替佐米单药治疗复发性多发性骨髓瘤的回顾性配对分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bortezomib-dexamethasone is widely used for relapsed myeloma in routine clinical practice, but comparative data versus single-agent bortezomib are lacking. This retrospective analysis compared second-line treatment with bortezomib-dexamethasone and bortezomib using 109 propensity score-matched pairs of patients treated in three clinical trials: MMY-2045, APEX, and DOXIL-MMY-3001. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression analyses incorporating 13 clinical variables related to drug exposure or clinical outcome. Patients received intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, in 21-day cycles, alone or with oral dexamethasone 20 mg on the days of/after bortezomib dosing. Median bortezomib cumulative dose (27.02 and 28.60 mg/m2) and treatment duration (19.6 and 17.6 weeks) were similar with bortezomib-dexamethasone and bortezomib, respectively. The overall response rate was higher (75% vs. 41%; odds ratio=3.467; P<0.001), and median time-to-progression (13.6 vs. 7.0 months; hazard ratio [HR]=0.394; P=0.003) and progression-free survival (11.9 vs. 6.4 months; HR=0.595; P=0.051) were longer with bortezomib-dexamethasone versus bortezomib, respectively. Rates of any-grade adverse events, most common grade 3 or higher adverse events, and discontinuations due to adverse events appeared similar between the groups. Two patients per group died of treatment-related adverse events. These data indicate the potential benefit of bortezomib-dexamethasone compared with single-agent bortezomib at first relapse in myeloma. The MMY-2045, APEX, and DOXIL-MMY-3001 clinical trials were registered at, respectively, identifier: 00908232, 00048230, and 00103506.
机译:在常规临床实践中,硼替佐米-地塞米松广泛用于复发性骨髓瘤,但缺乏与单药硼替佐米的比较数据。这项回顾性分析比较了三项临床试验(MMY-2045,APEX和DOXIL-MMY-3001)中使用109份倾向评分匹配的患者对硼替佐米-地塞米松和硼替佐米的二线治疗。使用Logistic回归分析评估倾向得分,该分析纳入了13个与药物暴露或临床结局相关的临床变量。患者在第21天的第1天,第4天,第8天和第11天接受口服硼替佐米1.3 mg / m 2 ,在硼替佐米服药的当日/之后,单独或口服地塞米松20 mg。与硼替佐米-地塞米松和硼替佐米相比,硼替佐米的中位累积剂量(27.02和28.60 mg / m 2 )和治疗持续时间(19.6和17.6周)相似。总体缓解率较高(75%比41%;优势比= 3.467; P <0.001)和中位进展时间(13.6 vs. 7.0个月;危险比[HR] = 0.394; P = 0.003)硼替佐米-地塞米松与硼替佐米的生存率和无进展生存期(11.9 vs. 6.4个月; HR = 0.595; P = 0.051)分别更长。两组之间的任何等级不良事件,最常见的3级或更高等级不良事件以及因不良事件导致的停药的发生率在两组之间均相似。每组两名患者死于与治疗有关的不良事件。这些数据表明在骨髓瘤首次复发时,硼替佐米-地塞米松与单药硼替佐米相比具有潜在的益处。 MMY-2045,APEX和DOXIL-MMY-3001临床试验分别注册在标识符:00908232、00048230和00103506。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号