首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran >The effect of short-term workshop on improving clinical reasoning skill of medical students
【2h】

The effect of short-term workshop on improving clinical reasoning skill of medical students

机译:短期研讨会对提高医学生临床推理能力的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background: Clinical reasoning process leads clinician to get purposeful steps from signs and symptoms toward diagnosis and treatment. This research intends to investigate the effect of teaching clinical reasoning on problem-solving skills of medical students. >Methods: This research is a semi-experimental study. Nineteen Medical student of the pediatric ward as case group participated in a two-day workshop for training clinical reasoning. Before the workshop, they filled out Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI) questionnaires. Fifteen days after the workshop the DTI questionnaire completed and "key feature" (KF) test and "clinical reasoning problem" (CRP) test was held. 23 Medical student as the control group, without passing the clinical reasoning workshop DTI questionnaire completed, and KF test and CRP test was held. >Results: The average score of the DTI questionnaire in the control group was 162.04 and in the case group before the workshop was 153.26 and after the workshop was 181.68. Compare the average score of the DTI questionnaire before and after the workshop there is a significant difference. The difference between average KF test scores in the control and the case group was not significant but between average CRP test scores was significant. >Conclusion: Clinical reasoning workshop is effectiveness in promoting problem-solving skills of students.
机译:>背景:临床推理过程使临床医生从标志和症状到诊断和治疗采取有目的的步骤。本研究旨在探讨临床推理教学对医学生解决问题能力的影响。 >方法:该研究是一项半实验性研究。病例组的19名医学生参加了为期两天的研讨会,以培训临床推理。在研讨会之前,他们填写了诊断思维清单(DTI)问卷。研讨会之后的15天,完成了DTI问卷调查,并举行了“关键特征”(KF)测试和“临床推理问题”(CRP)测试。 23名医学生为对照组,未通过临床推理讲习班的DTI问卷,未完成KF,CRP测试。 >结果:对照组中DTI问卷的平均得分为162.04,进修前的病例组为153.26,进修后为181.68。比较研讨会前后DTI问卷的平均得分有显着差异。对照组和病例组之间的平均KF测试得分之间的差异不显着,但CRP测试的平均得分之间存在显着差异。>结论:临床推理研讨会有效地提高了学生的解决问题的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号