首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Economics Review >Does performance-based financing increase value for money in low- and middle- income countries? A systematic review
【2h】

Does performance-based financing increase value for money in low- and middle- income countries? A systematic review

机译:基于绩效的融资是否会增加中低收入国家的货币价值?系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Governments of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are widely implementing performance-based financing (PBF) to improve healthcare services. However, it is unclear whether PBF provides good value for money compared to status quo or other interventions aimed at strengthening the healthcare system in LMICs. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and synthesize the existing literature that examines whether PBF represents an efficient manner of investing resources. We considered PBF to be efficient when improved care quality or quantity was achieved with equal or lower costs, or alternatively, when the same quality of care was achieved using less financial resources. A manual search of the reference lists of two recent systematic reviews on economic evaluations of PBF was conducted to identify articles that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, a search strategy was developed with the help of a librarian. The following databases and search engines were used: PubMed, EconLit, Google Scholar and Google. Experts on economic evaluations were consulted for validation of the selected studies. A total of seven articles from five LMICs were selected for this review. We found the overall strength of the evidence to be weak. None of the articles were full economic evaluations; they did not make clear connections between the costs and effects of PBF. Only one study reported using a randomized controlled trial, but issues with the randomization procedure were reported. Important alternative interventions to strengthen the capacities of the healthcare system have not been considered. Few studies examined the costs and consequences of PBF in the long term. Important costs and consequences were omitted from the evaluations. Few LMICs are represented in the literature, despite wide implementation. Lastly, most articles had at least one author employed by an organization involved in the implementation of PBF, thereby resulting in potential conflicts of interest. Stronger empirical evidence on whether PBF represents good value for money in LMICs is needed.
机译:中低收入国家(LMIC)的政府正在广泛实施基于绩效的融资(PBF),以改善医疗服务。但是,目前尚不清楚,与现状或旨在加强中低收入国家的医疗体系的其他干预措施相比,PBF是否能提供物有所值的服务。本系统综述的目的是确定和综合现有文献,以检查PBF是否代表一种有效的资源投资方式。当以相同或更低的成本获得改善的护理质量或数量时,或者使用较少的财务资源获得相同的护理质量时,我们认为PBF是有效的。手动搜索了有关PBF的经济评估的两个最新系统评价的参考列表,以确定符合我们纳入和排除标准的文章。随后,在图书馆员的帮助下制定了搜索策略。使用了以下数据库和搜索引擎:PubMed,EconLit,Google Scholar和Google。咨询了经济评估专家以验证所选研究的有效性。共有5个中低收入国家的7篇文章入选本次审查。我们发现证据的整体实力很弱。这些文章都不是对经济的全面评价。他们没有在PBF的成本和效果之间建立明确的联系。只有一项研究报告使用随机对照试验,但报告了随机程序的问题。尚未考虑采取重要的替代干预措施来增强医疗保健系统的能力。从长远来看,很少有研究检查PBF的成本和后果。评估中忽略了重要的成本和后果。尽管实施广泛,但很少有LMIC在文献中有代表。最后,大多数文章至少有一位作者被参与PBF实施的组织雇用,从而导致潜在的利益冲突。需要更强有力的经验证据来证明PBF是否在中低收入国家中物有所值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号