首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores?
【2h】

Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores?

机译:基于EQ-5D的成本效用估算值是否与基于效用得分映射的估算值不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundMapping has been used to convert scores from condition-specific measures into utility scores, and to produce estimates of cost-effectiveness. We sought to compare the QALY gains, and incremental cost per QALY estimates, predicted on the basis of mapping to those based on actual EQ-5D scores.
机译:BackgroundMapping已用于将特定条件下的评分转换为效用评分,并产生成本效益估算。我们试图比较根据映射到基于实际EQ-5D分数得出的QALY收益和每个QALY估计的增量成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号