首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services
【2h】

Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services

机译:提出正确的问题:开展有关组织和提供卫生服务的研究的范围研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Scoping studies have been used across a range of disciplines for a wide variety of purposes. However, their value is increasingly limited by a lack of definition and clarity of purpose. The UK's Service Delivery and Organisation Research Programme (SDO) has extensive experience of commissioning and using such studies; twenty four have now been completed.This review article has four objectives; to describe the nature of the scoping studies that have been commissioned by the SDO Programme; to consider the impact of and uses made of such studies; to provide definitions for the different elements that may constitute a scoping study; and to describe the lessons learnt by the SDO Programme in commissioning scoping studies.Scoping studies are imprecisely defined but usually consist of one or more discrete components; most commonly they are non-systematic reviews of the literature, but other important elements are literature mapping, conceptual mapping and policy mapping. Some scoping studies also involve consultations with stakeholders including the end users of research.Scoping studies have been used for a wide variety of purposes, although a common feature is to identify questions and topics for future research. The reports of scoping studies often have an impact that extends beyond informing research commissioners about future research areas; some have been published in peer reviewed journals, and others have been published in research summaries aimed at a broader audience of health service managers and policymakers.Key lessons from the SDO experience are the need to relate scoping studies to a particular health service context; the need for scoping teams to be multi-disciplinary and to be given enough time to integrate diverse findings; and the need for the research commissioners to be explicit not only about the aims of scoping studies but also about their intended uses. This necessitates regular contact between researchers and commissioners.Scoping studies are an essential element in the portfolio of approaches to research, particularly as a mechanism for helping research commissioners and policy makers to ask the right questions. Their utility will be further enhanced by greater recognition of the individual components, definitions for which are provided.
机译:范围界定研究已在多种学科中用于多种目的。但是,由于缺乏定义和目的明确,其价值越来越受到限制。英国的服务提供和组织研究计划(SDO)在调试和使用此类研究方面具有丰富的经验;现在已经完成了二十四个。描述由SDO计划委托进行的范围界定研究的性质;考虑此类研究的影响和用途;提供可能构成范围界定研究的不同要素的定义;范围研究的定义不够精确,但通常由一个或多个独立的组成部分组成;并且描述了SDO计划在委托范围研究中吸取的经验教训。通常,它们是文献的非系统性评论,但其他重要元素是文献映射,概念映射和策略映射。一些范围界定研究还涉及与利益相关者(包括研究的最终用户)进行协商。范围界定研究已被用于多种目的,尽管其共同特征是为将来的研究确定问题和主题。范围研究的报告所产生的影响通常不仅限于向研究专员通报未来的研究领域。 SDO经验的主要教训是需要将范围界定研究与特定的卫生服务环境相关联; SDO经验的关键教训是:有些已经在同行评审期刊上发表,有些已经在研究摘要上发表,其对象是更广泛的卫生服务经理和政策制定者。范围界定团队需要跨学科,并有足够的时间整合各种发现;研究专员不仅需要明确范围研究的目的,还必须明确其预期用途。这就需要研究人员和专员之间进行定期接触。范围界定研究是研究方法组合中的一个基本要素,尤其是作为一种机制,可以帮助研究专员和政策制定者提出正确的问题。通过更好地识别各个组件(为其提供了定义),将进一步提高其效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号