首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Harm Reduction Journal >Methadone treatment providers’ views of drug court policy and practice: a case study of New York State
【2h】

Methadone treatment providers’ views of drug court policy and practice: a case study of New York State

机译:美沙酮治疗提供者对毒品法庭政策和做法的看法:纽约州的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSpecialized drug treatment courts are a central part of drug-related policy and programs in the United States and increasingly outside the U.S. While in theory they offer treatment as a humane and pragmatic alternative to arrest and incarceration for certain categories of drug offenses, they may exclude some forms of treatment–notably methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). We sought to understand from the perspective of treatment providers whether this exclusion existed and was of public health importance in New York State as a case example of a state heavily committed to drug courts and with varying court-level policies on MMT. Drug courts have been extensively evaluated but not with respect to exclusion of MMT and not from the perspective of treatment providers.
机译:背景技术专门的毒品治疗法院是美国和美国以外与毒品有关的政策和计划的核心部分,尽管从理论上讲,它们可以将人道和务实的治疗作为对某些类型的毒品犯罪的逮捕和监禁的替代,但它们可能会排除在外某些形式的治疗,尤其是美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)。我们试图从治疗提供者的角度来理解这种排斥是否存在,并且在纽约州是否具有公共卫生重要性,这是一个州严重致力于毒品法院并且对MMT采取不同法院级别政策的案例。药物法院已经得到了广泛的评估,但并未从排除MMT的角度进行评估,也未从治疗提供者的角度进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号