首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical Devices (Auckland N.Z.) >Comparison of drug delivery with autoinjector versus manual prefilled syringe and between three different autoinjector devices administered in pig thigh
【2h】

Comparison of drug delivery with autoinjector versus manual prefilled syringe and between three different autoinjector devices administered in pig thigh

机译:使用自动注射器与手动预填充注射器以及三种在猪大腿中使用的自动注射器之间的给药比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Parenteral routes of drug administration are often selected to optimize actual dose of drug delivered, assure high bioavailability, bypass first-pass metabolism or harsh gastrointestinal environments, as well as maximize the speed of onset. Intramuscular (IM) delivery can be preferred to intravenous delivery when initiating intravenous access is difficult or impossible. Drugs can be injected intramuscularly using a syringe or an automated delivery device (autoinjector). Investigation into the IM delivery dynamics of these methods may guide further improvements in the performance of injection technologies. Two porcine model studies were conducted to compare differences in dispersion of injectate volume for different methods of IM drug administration. The first study compared the differences in the degree of dispersion and uptake of injectate following the use of a manual syringe and an autoinjector. The second study compared the spatial spread of the injected formulation, or dispersion volume, and uptake of injectate following the use of five different autoinjectors (EpiPen® [0.3 mL], EpiPen® Jr [0.3 mL], Twinject® [0.15 mL, 0.3 mL], and Anapen® 300 [0.3 mL]) with varying needle length, needle gauge, and force applied to the plunger. In the first study, the autoinjector provided higher peak volumes of injectate, indicating a greater degree of dispersion, compared with manual syringe delivery. In the second study, EpiPen autoinjectors resulted in larger dispersion volumes and higher initial dispersion ratios, which decreased rapidly over time, suggesting a greater rate of uptake of injectate than the other autoinjectors. The differences in dispersion and uptake of injectate are likely the result of different functional characteristics of the delivery systems. Both studies demonstrate that the functional characteristics of the method for delivering IM injections impact the dispersion and uptake of the material injected, which could significantly affect the pharmacokinetics and, ultimately, the effectiveness of the drug.
机译:通常选择肠胃外给药途径,以优化实际给药剂量,确保高生物利用度,绕过首过代谢或恶劣的胃肠道环境,并最大程度地加快发病速度。当难以或不可能启动静脉内通路时,肌内(IM)输送优于静脉内输送。可以使用注射器或自动递送装置(自动注射器)肌肉注射药物。对这些方法的IM传递动力学的研究可能会指导注射技术性能的进一步提高。进行了两次猪模型研究,以比较不同IM药物给药方法的注射量分散度的差异。首次研究比较了使用手动注射器和自动注射器后注射液的分散度和吸收程度的差异。第二项研究比较了使用五种不同的自动注射器(EpiPen ® [0.3 mL],EpiPen ® Jr [0.3 mL],Twinject ® [0.15 mL,0.3 mL]和Anapen ® 300 [0.3 mL]),针头长度,针规和力均不同应用于柱塞。在第一个研究中,与手动注射器进样相比,自动进样器提供了更高的进样峰体积,表明更大程度的分散。在第二项研究中,EpiPen自动进样器导致更大的分散体积和更高的初始分散率,随着时间的推移,其迅速下降,这表明与其他自动进样器相比,注射剂的吸收率更高。注射液的分散度和吸收率的差异可能是输送系统功能特性不同的结果。两项研究均表明,用于IM注射的方法的功能特性会影响所注射材料的分散和吸收,这可能会显着影响药物动力学,最终影响药物的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号