首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gut Microbes >Differences in microbial signatures between rectal mucosal biopsies and rectal swabs
【2h】

Differences in microbial signatures between rectal mucosal biopsies and rectal swabs

机译:直肠黏膜活检和直肠拭子之间的微生物特征差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is growing evidence the microbiota of the large bowel may influence the risk of developing colorectal cancer as well as other diseases including type-1 diabetes, inflammatory bowel diseases and irritable bowel syndrome. Current sampling methods to obtain microbial specimens, such as feces and mucosal biopsies, are inconvenient and unappealing to patients. Obtaining samples through rectal swabs could prove to be a quicker and relatively easier method, but it is unclear if swabs are an adequate substitute. We compared bacterial diversity and composition from rectal swabs and rectal mucosal biopsies in order to examine the viability of rectal swabs as an alternative to biopsies. Paired rectal swabs and mucosal biopsy samples were collected in un-prepped participants (n = 11) and microbial diversity was characterized by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of the 16S rRNA gene. Microbial community composition from swab samples was different from rectal mucosal biopsies (p = 0.001). Overall the bacterial diversity was higher in swab samples than in biopsies as assessed by diversity indexes such as: richness (p = 0.01), evenness (p = 0.06) and Shannon’s diversity (p = 0.04). Analysis of specific bacterial groups by qPCR showed higher copy number of Lactobacillus (p < 0.0001) and Eubacteria (p = 0.0003) in swab samples compared with biopsies. Our findings suggest that rectal swabs and rectal mucosal samples provide different views of the microbiota in the large intestine.
机译:越来越多的证据表明,大肠的微生物群可能会影响发展大肠癌以及其他疾病的风险,包括1型糖尿病,炎性肠病和肠易激综合症。当前用于获取微生物标本(例如粪便和粘膜活检标本)的采样方法不方便且对患者没有吸引力。通过直肠拭子获取样本可能被证明是一种更快,相对更容易的方法,但是尚不清楚拭子是否可以替代。我们比较了直肠拭子和直肠粘膜活检组织中细菌的多样性和成分,以检查直肠拭子作为活检的替代方法的可行性。成对的直肠拭子和粘膜活检样品收集于未准备的参与者(n = 11)中,通过16S rRNA基因的末端限制性片段长度多态性(T-RFLP)分析和定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)来表征微生物多样性。拭子样本中的微生物群落组成与直肠黏膜活检不同(p = 0.001)。总体而言,拭子样本中的细菌多样性高于活检组织中的多样性指标,这些指标通过多样性指数进行评估,例如:丰富度(p = 0.01),均匀度(p = 0.06)和香农的多样性(p = 0.04)。通过qPCR分析特定细菌组显示,与活检相比,拭子样品中的乳杆菌(p <0.0001)和真细菌(p = 0.0003)的拷贝数更高。我们的发现表明,直肠拭子和直肠粘膜样品提供了大肠中微生物群的不同视图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号