首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association >Biliary reconstruction using non-penetrating tissue everting clips versus conventional sewn biliary anastomosis in liver transplantation
【2h】

Biliary reconstruction using non-penetrating tissue everting clips versus conventional sewn biliary anastomosis in liver transplantation

机译:在肝移植中使用非穿透性组织外翻夹进行胆道重建与常规缝合胆道吻合术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Biliary complications occur following approximately 25% of liver transplantations. Efforts to decrease biliary complications include methods designed to diminish tissue ischemia. Previously, we reported excellent short-term results and decreased biliary anastomosis time in a porcine liver transplant model using non-penetrating, tissue everting clips (NTEC), specifically VCS® clips. Methods. We examined the incidence of biliary anastomotic complications in a group of patients in whom orthotopic liver transplantation was performed with biliary reconstruction using NTEC and compared that group to a matched group treated with biliary reconstruction via conventional end-to-end sewn choledochocholedochostomy. Patients were matched in a 1:2 fashion by age at transplantation, disease etiology, Child-Turcot-Pugh scores, MELD score or UNOS status (prior to 1998), cold and warm ischemia times, organ donor age, and date of transplantation. Results. Seventeen patients had clipped anastomosis and 34 comparison patients had conventional sewn anastomosis. There were no differences between groups in terms of baseline clinical or demographic data. The median time from completion of the hepatic artery anastomosis to completion of clipped versus conventional sewn biliary anastomosis was 45 (interquartile range = 20 min) versus 47 min (interquartile range = 23 min), respectively (p=0.12). Patients were followed for a mean of 29 months. Biliary anastomotic complications, including leak or anastomotic stricture, were observed in 18% of the clipped group and 24% of the conventional sewn group. Conclusions. Biliary reconstruction can be performed clinically using NTEC as an alternative to conventional sewn biliary anastomoses with good results.
机译:背景。大约25%的肝移植后发生胆道并发症。减少胆道并发症的努力包括旨在减少组织缺血的方法。以前,我们报道了在猪肝移植模型中使用非穿透性组织外翻夹(NTEC)特别是VCS®夹的出色的短期结果,并减少了胆道吻合时间。方法。我们检查了一组使用NTEC进行胆道重建的原位肝移植患者的胆管吻合并发症发生率,并将该组与通过常规端到端缝合胆总管胆道切开术进行胆道重建治疗的匹配组进行了比较。通过移植年龄,疾病病因,Child-Turcot-Pugh评分,MELD评分或UNOS状态(1998年之前),冷热缺血时间,器官供体年龄和移植日期以1:2的方式对患者进行匹配。结果。 17名患者夹吻合术,34例比较患者进行常规缝制吻合术。两组之间在基线临床或人口统计学数据方面没有差异。从完成肝动脉吻合到完成缝合吻合胆道吻合术与传统缝合胆道吻合术的中位时间分别为45分钟(四分位间距= 20分钟)与47分钟(四分位间距= 23分钟)(p = 0.12)。平均随访29个月。胆囊吻合并发症,包括渗漏或吻合口狭窄,在修剪组中为18%,在常规缝合组中为24%。结论。使用NTEC替代传统的缝合胆道吻合术可在临床上进行胆道重建,效果良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号