首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Vaccines Immunotherapeutics >Can growth inhibition assays (GIA) predict blood-stage malaria vaccine efficacy?
【2h】

Can growth inhibition assays (GIA) predict blood-stage malaria vaccine efficacy?

机译:生长抑制试验(GIA)可以预测血液阶段疟疾疫苗的功效吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An effective vaccine against P. falciparum malaria remains a global health priority. Blood-stage vaccines are an important component of this effort, with some indications of recent progress. However only a fraction of potential blood-stage antigens have been tested, highlighting a critical need for efficient down-selection strategies. Functional in vitro assays such as the growth/invasion inhibition assays (GIA) are widely used, but it is unclear whether GIA activity correlates with protection or predicts vaccine efficacy. While preliminary data in controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies indicate a possible association between in vitro and in vivo parasite growth rates, there have been conflicting results of immunoepidemiology studies, where associations with exposure rather than protection have been observed. In addition, GIA-interfering antibodies in vaccinated individuals from endemic regions may limit assay sensitivity in heavily malaria-exposed populations. More work is needed to establish the utility of GIA for blood-stage vaccine development.
机译:有效的抗恶性疟原虫疫苗仍然是全球卫生重点。血液疫苗是这项工作的重要组成部分,并有近期进展的迹象。但是,仅测试了一部分潜在的血液阶段抗原,这突出显示了对有效的向下选择策略的迫切需求。功能性体外测定,例如生长/侵袭抑制测定(GIA),已被广泛使用,但尚不清楚GIA活性是否与保护相关或预测疫苗功效。尽管受控人类疟疾感染(CHMI)研究的初步数据表明体外和体内寄生虫生长率之间可能存在关联,但免疫流行病学研究的结果却相互矛盾,其中观察到的是暴露而不是保护。此外,来自地方性地区的疫苗接种个体中的GIA干扰抗体可能会限制疟疾严重感染人群的检测灵敏度。需要更多的工作来建立GIA在血液阶段疫苗开发中的用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号