首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Immunity Ageing : I A >Booster vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria: insufficient protection against diphtheria in young and elderly adults
【2h】

Booster vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria: insufficient protection against diphtheria in young and elderly adults

机译:破伤风和白喉加强免疫:年轻人和老年人的白喉预防措施不足

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We have recently demonstrated that single shot vaccinations against tetanus and diphtheria do not lead to long-lasting immunity against diphtheria in elderly persons despite administration at 5 year intervals. In the present study we have immunized a group of young adults against tetanus and diphtheria to compare the pre- and 28 days post-vaccination immune responses in the young group with results of the same vaccination performed in an elderly group of a previous study. We also studied protection in both groups 5 years after vaccination. We compared antibody titers at all three time points and also analyzed the T cell responses in both age groups 5 years after vaccination.Before vaccination 9 % of the elderly persons were not protected against tetanus, and 48 % did not have protection against diphtheria. In the young group all participants were protected against tetanus, but 52 % were also unprotected against diphtheria before vaccination. 28 days after vaccination 100 % of all participants had protective antibody concentrations against tetanus and only a small percentage in each age group (<10 %) was unprotected against diphtheria. 5 years later, 100 % of both cohorts were still protected against tetanus, but 24 % of the young and 54 % of the elderly group were unprotected against diphtheria. Antibody concentrations against diphtheria measured by ELISA correlated well with their neutralizing capacity. T cell responses to tetanus and diphtheria did not differ between young and old persons. We conclude that booster vaccinations against tetanus and diphtheria according to present recommendations provide long-lasting protection only against tetanus, but not against diphtheria, independently of age. In elderly persons, the level of protection is even lower, probably due to intrinsic age-related changes within the immune system and/or insufficient vaccination earlier in life.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12979-016-0081-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:我们最近证明,尽管每隔5年注射一次,针对破伤风和白喉的单次疫苗接种不会导致老年人对白喉的持久免疫力。在本研究中,我们已经对一群年轻人进行了破伤风和白喉疫苗的免疫接种,以比较年轻人组在接种前和接种后28天的免疫反应与先前研究的老年组进行的相同疫苗接种的结果。我们还研究了疫苗接种5年后两组的保护作用。我们比较了三个时间点的抗体效价,并分析了接种疫苗后5年的两个年龄组的T细胞反应。接种疫苗前9%的老年人没有预防破伤风的预防,而48%的老人没有白喉的预防。在年轻组中,所有参与者都得到了预防破伤风的保护,但是52%的人在接种疫苗前也没有受到白喉的保护。接种后28天,所有参与者中有100%对破伤风具有保护性抗体浓度,并且每个年龄组中只有一小部分(<10%)没有针对白喉的保护性抗体。 5年后,这两个队列中的100%仍未受到破伤风的保护,但是24%的年轻人和54%的老年人没有对白喉的保护。通过ELISA测量的针对白喉的抗体浓度与其中和能力密切相关。年轻人和老年人之间,对破伤风和白喉的T细胞反应无差异。我们得出的结论是,根据目前的建议,针对破伤风和白喉的加强疫苗只能提供针对破伤风的长期保护,而与年龄无关,不能提供针对白喉的长期保护。在老年人中,保护水平甚至更低,这可能是由于免疫系统内与年龄相关的内在变化和/或生命早期接种不足引起的。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1186 / s12979-016- 0081-0)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号