首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Indian Journal of Hematology Blood Transfusion >Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Stem Cell Treatment as Compared to Conventional Chemotherapy for Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in India
【2h】

Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Stem Cell Treatment as Compared to Conventional Chemotherapy for Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in India

机译:与印度传统化学疗法治疗多发性骨髓瘤相比自体干细胞治疗的成本-效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent innovations in treatment of multiple myeloma include autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) along with high dose chemotherapy (HDC). We undertook this study to estimate incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained (QALY) with use of ASCT along with HDC as compared to conventional chemotherapy (CC) alone in treatment of multiple myeloma. A combination of decision tree and markov model was used to undertake the analysis. Incremental costs and effects of ASCT were compared against the baseline scenario of CC (based on Melphalan and Prednisolone regimen) in the patients of multiple myeloma. A lifetime study horizon was used and future costs and consequences were discounted at 5%. Consequences were valued in terms of QALYs. Incremental cost per QALY gained using ASCT as against CC for treatment of multiple myeloma was estimated using both a health system and societal perspective. The cost of providing ASCT (with HDC) for multiple myeloma patients was INR 500,631, while the cost of CC alone was INR 159,775. In the long run, cost per patient per year for ASCT and CC arms was estimated to be INR 119,740 and INR 111,565 respectively. The number of QALYs lived per patient in case of ASCT and HDC alone were found to be 4.1 and 3.5 years respectively. From a societal perspective, ASCT was found to incur an incremental cost of INR 334,433 per QALY gained. If the ASCT is initiated early to patients, the incremental cost for ASCT was found to be INR 180,434 per QALY gained. With current mix of patients, stem cell treatment for multiple myeloma is not cost effective at a threshold of GDP per capita. It becomes marginally cost-effective at 3-times the GDP per capita threshold. However, accounting for the model uncertainties, the probability of ASCT to be cost effective is 59%. Cost effectiveness of ASCT can be improved with early detection and initiation of treatment.
机译:多发性骨髓瘤的最新治疗方法包括自体干细胞移植(ASCT)以及高剂量化疗(HDC)。我们进行了这项研究,以估计与单独使用常规化学疗法(CC)相比,使用ASCT和HDC所获得的每质量调整生命年(QALY)所带来的增量成本(QALY)与多发性骨髓瘤的单独治疗相比。决策树和马尔可夫模型相结合进行分析。在多发性骨髓瘤患者中,将ASCT的增量成本和疗效与CC的基线情况(基于Melphalan和泼尼松龙方案)进行了比较。使用了终生研究范围,并将未来成本和后果折现为5%。结果是根据QALY评估的。使用ASCT相对于CC治疗多发性骨髓瘤所获得的每QALY的增量成本是从卫生系统和社会角度进行估算的。为多发性骨髓瘤患者提供ASCT(含HDC)的费用为500,631印度卢比,而仅CC的费用为159,775印度卢比。从长期来看,ASCT和CC装置每名患者每年的费用估计分别为119,740印度卢比和111,565印度卢比。仅ASCT和HDC的情况下,每位患者的QALY生存时间分别为4.1年和3.5年。从社会角度来看,发现ASCT每获得一个QALY就要增加334,433印度卢比的成本。如果ASCT对患者提早开始,则每增加一个QALY,ASCT的增量成本为180,434印度卢比。以目前的患者数量来看,干细胞治疗多发性骨髓瘤在人均GDP的门槛下并不划算。它是人均GDP阈值的3倍,因此具有一定的成本效益。但是,考虑到模型的不确定性,ASCT具有成本效益的可能性为59%。早期发现和开始治疗可以提高ASCT的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号