首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Indian Journal of Hematology Blood Transfusion >Cyclosporine Plus Methotrexate or Cyclosporine Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil as Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in Acute Leukemia Transplant: Comparison of Toxicity Engraftment Kinetics and Transplant Outcome
【2h】

Cyclosporine Plus Methotrexate or Cyclosporine Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil as Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in Acute Leukemia Transplant: Comparison of Toxicity Engraftment Kinetics and Transplant Outcome

机译:环孢素加甲氨蝶呤或环孢素加霉酚酸酯作为急性白血病移植中宿主疾病预防的移植物:毒性植入动力学和移植结果的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We sought to compare two graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen, cyclosporine and methotrexate (CsA+MTX) with CsA+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 77 acute leukemia patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) between January 2008 and March 2013. Fifty-three patients received CsA+MTX while 24 received CsA+MMF. The incidence of grade 3–4 mucositis and grade 3–4 diarrhea was 74 and 6 % with CsA+MTX compared to 33 % and 21 % with CsA+MMF (P = 0.001 and 0.09 respectively). Forty-two (79 %) patients in CsA+MTX group required total parenteral nutrition compared to 14 (58 %) in CsA+MMF group (P = 0.09). The incidence of engraftment fever was 17 % with CsA+MTX and 41 % with CsA+MMF (P = 0.02). The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 14 days and 13 days with CsA+MTX compared to 12 days and 10 days with CsA+MMF (P = 0.003 and 0.08 respectively). The incidence of any grade and grade II–IV acute GVHD was 45 and 13 % with CsA+MTX compared to 42 and 29 % with CsA+MMF (P = NS). Incidence of overall and extensive chronic GVHD was 57 and 38 % with CsA+MTX compared to 42 and 17 % with CsA+MMF (P = NS). Incidence of relapse was 38 % with CsA+MTX compared to 33 % with CsA+MMF (P = NS). TRM was 6 % with CsA+MTX and 21 % with CsA+MMF (P = NS). At 2 years, overall survival (OS) was 64 % in CsA+MTX group compared to 46 % in CsA+MMF group (P = NS). We conclude that CsA+MMF is associated with lesser toxicity, faster myeloid engraftment and similar rates of acute and chronic GVHD, TRM, relapse and OS compared to CsA+MTX in acute leukemia transplant.
机译:我们试图比较两种移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的预防方案,环孢素和甲氨蝶呤(CsA + MTX)与CsA +霉酚酸酯(MMF)在2008年1月之间接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的77例急性白血病患者中的比较和2013年3月。53例患者接受了CsA + MTX,而24例接受了CsA + MMF。 CsA + MTX的3-4级粘膜炎和3-4级腹泻的发生率分别为74%和6%,而CsA + MMF的发生率分别为33%和21%(P分别为0.001和0.09)。 CsA + MTX组的四十二(79%)位患者需要全胃肠外营养,而CsA + MMF组的14位(58%)(P = 0.09)。 CsA + MTX的植入发热发生率为17%,CsA + MMF的植入发热发生率为41%(P = 0.02)。 CsA + MTX的中性粒细胞和血小板移植的中位时间为14天和13天,而CsA + MMF的中位时间为12天和10天(P分别为0.003和0.08)。 CsA + MTX的任何II级和IV级IVG急性GVHD的发生率分别为45%和13%,而CsA + MMF的发生率为42%和29%(P = NS)。 CsA + MTX的总体和广泛的慢性GVHD的发生率分别为57%和38%,而CsA + MMF的发生率为42%和17%(P = NS)。 CsA + MTX的复发率为38%,而CsA + MMF的复发率为33%(P = NS)。 CsA + MTX的TRM为6%,CsA + MMF的TRM为21%(P = NS)。在2年时,CsA + MTX组的总生存率(OS)为64%,而CsA + MMF组的总生存率(OS)为46%(P = NS)。我们得出的结论是,与急性白血病移植物中的CsA + MTX相比,CsA + MMF与较小的毒性,更快的骨髓植入以及与CsA + MTX相似的急慢性GVHD,TRM,复发和OS发生率相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号