首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Indian Journal of Surgery >Digital Photography and Transparency-Based Methods for Measuring Wound Surface Area
【2h】

Digital Photography and Transparency-Based Methods for Measuring Wound Surface Area

机译:基于数字摄影和透明度的伤口表面面积测量方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare and determine a credible method of measurement of wound surface area by linear, transparency, and photographic methods for monitoring progress of wound healing accurately and ascertaining whether these methods are significantly different. From April 2005 to December 2006, 40 patients (30 men, 5 women, 5 children) admitted to the surgical ward of Shree Sayaji General Hospital, Baroda, had clean as well as infected wound following trauma, debridement, pressure sore, venous ulcer, and incision and drainage. Wound surface areas were measured by these three methods (linear, transparency, and photographic methods) simultaneously on alternate days. The linear method is statistically and significantly different from transparency and photographic methods (P value <0.05), but there is no significant difference between transparency and photographic methods (P value >0.05). Photographic and transparency methods provided measurements of wound surface area with equivalent result and there was no statistically significant difference between these two methods.
机译:通过线性,透明和照相方法比较和确定可靠的伤口表面积测量方法,以准确监测伤口愈合的进展并确定这些方法是否存在显着差异。从2005年4月到2006年12月,在创伤,清创,压疮,静脉溃疡,创伤,清创,静脉曲张和溃疡性溃疡的住院病人中,有40例(男30例,女5例,5名儿童)入住Barree Shree Sayaji综合医院的外科病房。和切口和引流。隔天同时通过这三种方法(线性,透明和照相方法)测量伤口的表面积。线性方法与透明度和照相方法在统计学上显着不同(P值<0.05),但透明度和照相方法之间没有显着差异(P值> 0.05)。照相和透明方法提供了对伤口表面积的测量结果,并且这两种方法之间没有统计学上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号