首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Injury Prevention >Comparison of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States
【2h】

Comparison of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States

机译:大韩民国和美国的意外致命职业伤害比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: To compare the profile of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States to help establish prevention strategies for Korea and to understand country specific differences in fatality risks in different industries. >Methods: Occupational fatal injury data from 1998–2001 were collected from Korea's Occupational Safety and Health Agency's Survey of Causes of Occupational Injuries (identified by the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation) and from the United States Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. Employment estimates were obtained in both countries. Industry coding and external cause of death coding were standardized. Descriptive analyses of injury rates and Poisson regression models to examine time trends were conducted. >Results: Korea exhibited a significantly higher fatal injury rate, at least two times higher than the United States, after accounting for different employment patterns. The ordering of industries with respect to risk is the same in the two countries, with mining, agriculture/forestry/fishing, and construction being the most dangerous. Fatal injury rates are decreasing in these two countries, although at a faster rate in Korea. >Conclusions: Understanding industrial practices within different countries is critical for fully understanding country specific occupational injury statistics. However, differences in surveillance systems and employment estimation methods serve as caveats to any transnational comparison, and need to be harmonized to the fullest extent possible.
机译:>目标:比较大韩民国和美国的意外致命性职业伤害的状况,以帮助制定韩国的预防策略,并了解不同行业在特定国家中死亡风险的差异。 >方法: 1998-2001年的职业致命伤害数据来自韩国职业安全与卫生局职业伤害原因调查(由韩国劳动福利公司确定)和美国致命职业普查受伤两国都获得了就业估计。行业编码和外部死亡原因编码已标准化。进行了描述性分析的伤害率和泊松回归模型以检查时间趋势。 >结果:在考虑了不同的就业模式之后,韩国的致命伤害率明显更高,至少是美国的两倍。两国在风险方面的行业排序是相同的,采矿,农业/林业/渔业和建筑业是最危险的。在这两个国家,致命伤害率正在下降,尽管在韩国,致命率下降的速度更快。 >结论:了解不同国家/地区的行业惯例对于全面了解特定国家/地区的职业伤害统计至关重要。但是,监视系统和就业估计方法的差异是任何跨国比较的警告,需要最大程度地加以协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号