首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Dentistry >Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Predicting Treatment Decision for Periapical Lesions: A Clinical Study
【2h】

Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Predicting Treatment Decision for Periapical Lesions: A Clinical Study

机译:锥形束计算机体层摄影术与根尖X线摄影在预测根尖病变的治疗决策中的比较:一项临床研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. To compare the ability of endodontists to determine the size of apical pathological lesions and select the most appropriate choice of treatment based on lesions' projected image characteristics using 2 D and 3 D images. Study Design. Twenty-four subjects were selected. Radiographic examination of symptomatic study teeth with an intraoral periapical radiograph revealed periapical lesions equal to or greater than 3 mm in the greatest diameter. Cone-beam Computed tomography (CBCT) images were made of the involved teeth after the intraoral periapical radiograph confirmed the size of lesion to be equal to greater than 3 mm. Six observers (endodontists) viewed both the periapical and CBCT images. Upon viewing each of the images from the two imaging modalities, observers (1) measured lesion size and (2) made decisions on treatment based on each radiograph. Chi-square test was used to look for differences in the choice of treatment among observers. Results. No significant difference was noted in the treatment plan selected by observers using the two modalities (χ 2(3) = .036, P > 0.05). Conclusion. Lesion size and choice of treatment of periapical lesions based on CBCT radiographs do not change significantly from those made on the basis of 2 D radiographs.
机译:目标。为了比较牙髓医师确定根尖病变的大小并使用2D和3D图像根据病变的投影图像特征选择最合适的治疗方法的能力。学习规划。选择了二十四个主题。对症研究牙齿的影像学检查通过口腔根尖周X光片检查发现,根尖周病变最大直径等于或大于3 mm。在口腔内根尖X线片确认病变的大小等于或大于3毫米后,对受累牙齿进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像。六位观察者(牙本质病医师)同时观察了根尖周和CBCT图像。在查看来自两种成像方式的每幅图像后,观察者(1)测量了病变的大小,(2)根据每张X射线照片对治疗做出了决定。卡方检验用于观察者之间在治疗选择上的差异。结果。观察者使用两种方式选择的治疗方案没有显着差异(χ 2 (3)= .036,P> 0.05)。结论。基于CBCT射线照相的病变大小和根尖周病变的治疗选择与基于2D射线照相所做的相比无明显变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号