首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Charitable Food Systems’ Capacity to Address Food Insecurity: An Australian Capital City Audit
【2h】

Charitable Food Systems’ Capacity to Address Food Insecurity: An Australian Capital City Audit

机译:慈善食品系统应对粮食不安全的能力:澳大利亚首都审计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Australian efforts to address food insecurity are delivered by a charitable food system (CFS) which fails to meet demand. The scope and nature of the CFS is unknown. This study audits the organisational capacity of the CFS within the 10.9 square kilometres of inner-city Perth, Western Australia. A desktop analysis of services and 12 face-to-face interviews with representatives from CFS organisations was conducted. All CFS organisations were not-for–profit and guided by humanitarian or faith-based values. The CFS comprised three indirect services (IS) sourcing, banking and/or distributing food to 15 direct services (DS) providing food to recipients. DS offered 30 different food services at 34 locations feeding over 5670 people/week via 16 models including mobile and seated meals, food parcels, supermarket vouchers, and food pantries. Volunteer to paid staff ratios were 33:1 (DS) and 19:1 (IS). System-wide, food was mainly donated and most funding was philanthropic. Only three organisations received government funds. No organisation had a nutrition policy. The organisational capacity of the CFS was precarious due to unreliable, insufficient and inappropriate financial, human and food resources and structures. System-wide reforms are needed to ensure adequate and appropriate food relief for Australians experiencing food insecurity.
机译:澳大利亚解决粮食不安全问题的努力是由无法满足需求的慈善粮食系统(CFS)进行的。 CFS的范围和性质未知。这项研究审核了西澳大利亚州珀斯市中心10.9平方公里内的CFS的组织能力。对服务进行了桌面分析,并与粮安委组织的代表进行了12次面对面的采访。所有粮安委组织都是非营利的,并以人道主义或基于信仰的价值观为指导。粮安委包括三个间接服务(IS)的采购,银行业务和/或分发食品,以及向接收者提供食物的15个直接服务(DS)。 DS通过16种模型在34个地点提供了30种不同的食物服务,每周服务超过5670人,包括移动和便餐,食物包裹,超市凭证和食品储藏室。志愿者与带薪员工比率为33:1(DS)和19:1(IS)。在全系统范围内,粮食主要是捐赠的,大部分资金是慈善的。只有三个组织获得了政府资金。没有组织制定营养政策。粮安委的组织能力pre可危,原因是财政,人力和粮食资源和结构不可靠,不足和不适当。需要进行全系统的改革,以确保遭受粮食不安全的澳大利亚人获得适当和适当的粮食救济。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号