首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Effect of Smoking Reduction Therapy on Smoking Cessation for Smokers without an Intention to Quit: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【2h】

Effect of Smoking Reduction Therapy on Smoking Cessation for Smokers without an Intention to Quit: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:减少吸烟疗法对无戒烟吸烟者戒烟的影响:随机对照试验的更新系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: Effective strategies are needed to encourage smoking cessation for smokers without an intention to quit. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate whether smoking reduction therapy can increase the long-term cessation rates of smokers without an intention to quit. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of smoking reduction therapy on long-term smoking cessation in smokers without an intention to quit. The primary outcome was the cessation rate at the longest follow-up period. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Fourteen trials with a total of 7981 smokers were included. The pooled analysis suggested that reduction support plus medication significantly increased the long-term cessation of smokers without an intention to quit compared to reduction support plus placebo (RR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44–2.7; I2, 52%) or no intervention (RR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.41–2.64; I2, 46%). In a subgroup of smokers who received varenicline or nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), the differences were also statistically significant. This suggests the safety of using NRT. The percentage of smokers with serious adverse events who discontinued because of these events in the non-NRT group was slightly significantly different than in the control group. Insufficient evidence is available to test the efficacy of reduction behavioural support in promoting long-term cessation among this population. Conclusions: The present meta-analysis indicated the efficacy of NRT- and varenicline-assisted reduction to achieve complete cessation among smokers without an intention to quit. Further evidence is needed to assess the efficacy and safety of reduction behavioural support and bupropion.
机译:目标:需要有效的策略来鼓励吸烟者无意戒烟。我们系统地回顾了文献,以研究减少吸烟疗法是否可以提高吸烟者的长期戒烟率而无意戒烟。方法:检索PubMed,Embase和CENTRAL(对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册),以了解减少吸烟疗法对无意戒烟的吸烟者长期戒烟的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是随访时间最长的戒烟率。随机效应模型用于计算汇总相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:包括14个试验,共计7981名吸烟者。汇总分析表明,与减少支持+安慰剂相比,减少支持+药物显着增加了长期吸烟者无戒烟意愿(RR,1.97; 95%CI,1.44–2.7; I 2 ,52%)或​​不进行干预(RR,1.93; 95%CI,1.41-2.64; I 2 ,46%)。在接受伐尼克兰或尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的吸烟者亚组中,差异也具有统计学意义。这表明使用NRT的安全性。在非NRT组中,因这些事件而中止的严重不良事件吸烟者的百分比与对照组相比有显着差异。没有足够的证据来测试减少行为支持在促进该人群中长期戒烟中的功效。结论:目前的荟萃分析表明,NRT和伐尼克兰辅助降低烟民可完全戒烟,且无戒烟意愿。还需要进一步的证据来评估减少行为支持和安非他酮的功效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号