首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy)
【2h】

Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy)

机译:为什么患者拒绝手术试验?来自英国癌症研究BOLERO试验中进行的定性访谈研究的结果(膀胱癌:开放式腹腔镜或机器人膀胱切除术)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSurgical trials have typically experienced recruitment difficulties when compared with other types of oncology trials. Qualitative studies have an important role to play in exploring reasons for low recruitment, although to date few such studies have been carried out that are embedded in surgical trials.The BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy) is a study to determine the feasibility of randomisation to open versus laparoscopic access/robotic cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. We describe the results of a qualitative study embedded within the clinical trial that explored why patients decline randomisation.
机译:背景与其他类型的肿瘤学试验相比,外科手术试验通常会遇到招募困难。定性研究在探索低招聘人数的原因中起着重要作用,尽管迄今为止,很少有这类研究被植入外科试验中。BOLERO试验(膀胱癌:开放性,腹腔镜或ROBotic膀胱切除术)确定在膀胱癌患者中随机分配开放性腹腔镜与腹腔镜/机器人膀胱切除术的可行性。我们描述了一项临床试验中定性研究的结果,该研究探讨了为什么患者拒绝随机分组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号